Bombay High Court
MANOJ PINCHAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application with liberty to prosecute the pending application before the Sessions Court.
Summary
Manoj Pincha applied for transit anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant informed the court that a similar application was already pending before the Dindoshi Sessions Court. He sought permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application while retaining the right to pursue the pending one. The High Court allowed the withdrawal, emphasizing that the applicant must be heard before any interim or final order is passed by the Sessions Court. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an applicant may withdraw a pending anticipatory bail application.
- Whether the applicant can be granted liberty to continue pursuing the same relief before another court.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- transit bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Judgment
9-ABA-2800-2026.doc
vaishnavi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2800 OF 2026
Manoj Pincha ...Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents
Ms. Agastya Desai, for the Applicant.
Ms. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Naresh Ghag, PSI, Samata Nagar Police Station, is present.
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 05th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant as well as learned APP
for respondent-State.
2. By this application, the applicant has sought transit
anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Crime No. 249 of 2025
registered at Police Station Kalyanpur, Commissionerate Kanpur
Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2)
of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
3. It is pointed out by learned APP that the application for
seeking transit anticipatory bail is pending before the Dindoshi
Sessions Court and is listed for tomorrow. In view of this, the learned
1/2
9-ABA-2800-2026.doc
counsel for applicant seeks leave to withdraw the instant application
with liberty to prosecute the application before Sessions Court at
Dindoshi.
4. Accordingly, the application is permitted to be withdrawn
with liberty to prosecute the pending application. It is clarified that
the applicant is entitled to be heard before passing any interim or final
order by the Sessions Court. In view of this, the application is disposed
of as withdrawn.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
2/2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.