Bombay High Court
SANTOSH PRAKASH SURMUKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Santosh Prakash Surmukh filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, challenging the State of Maharashtra's proceedings. The applicant was represented by counsel Rahul Dhaygude, Sujata B. Lohar, Suraj Bansode, and Tejas Kakade. The State was represented by P. P. Deokar. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel, on instructions, sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, not inclined to entertain the application, accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the anticipatory bail application should be entertained by the Court
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- criminal procedure
- withdrawal of application
- high court
Judgment
11-ABA-292-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 292 OF 2026
Santosh Prakash Surmukh
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Rahul Dhaygude a/w Ms. Sujata B. Lohar, Mr. Suraj Bansode,
Mr. Tejas Kakade, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. P. P. Deokar, APP for the Respondent-State.
...
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 21st MAY, 2026
[VACATION COURT]
P. C. :
1. After hearing at length, when this Court was not inclined to
entertain the application, learned counsel for the applicant on
instructions seeks withdrawal of the application.
2. Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.]
Sajakali Jamadar 1 of 1
Checking your session…