Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ARVIND BHARATBHUSHAN AGARWAL AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Bombay. They later settled the dispute with the complainant, eliminating any fear of arrest. The applicants, through counsel, requested to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, stating that the complainant's grievance no longer survived. The Court considered the request and, finding no apprehension of arrest, allowed the withdrawal. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn by the applicant when the complainant's grievance no longer exists

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • settlement
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                              903-ABA-3322-2024.ODT




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
            ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3322 OF 2024
Arvind Bharatbhushan Agarwal And Anr                              …Applicants
      Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Ors.                                 …Respondents


Adv. Atharva S. Jagtap i/b Bakul Bhosale, for the Applicants.
Mr. Bapu V. Holambe-Patil, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State.
PSI Sonali Patil, Shantinagar Police Station, Bhiwandi, is present.


                           CORAM :           PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                           DATE         :     8TH OCTOBER 2026
P. C.:-

1.          Adv. Atharva Jagtap holding for Adv. Bakul Bhosale, for

applicants states that the applicants have settled the controversy

with the          complainant     and since             the   grievance    of    the

complainant         does   not     survive,           the   applicants    have   no

apprehension of arrest and therefore he seeks permission to

withdraw the instant application.


2.          Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.




                                              (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
VDMokal/-




                                        Page 1 of 1
                                   th
                                  8 October 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.