Bombay High Court
SAAHIL PRASHANT TRIVEDIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and disposed of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Saahil Prashant Trivedi, filed an anticipatory bail application after FIR No. 645 of 2025 was registered. The High Court had earlier quashed the FIR in Writ Petition No. 2134 of 2026 on 19 June 2026. Following the quash, the applicant sought permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate procedure when an anticipatory bail application is pending but the underlying FIR has been quashed?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- FIR quash
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
7-ABA-3522-2025.odt
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3522 OF 2025
Saahil Prashant Trivedi ...Applicant
V/S.
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________________
Adv. Shrinidhi A Sonak i/b Saurabh Mehta, for the Applicant.
Adv. Bapu V Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
________________________________________________________
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 01st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the FIR in question
i.e. FIR No. 645 of 2025, has been quashed by this Court by order dated 19 th
June, 2026 in Writ Petition No. 2134 of 2026 and in view of this, he seeks
permission to withdraw the instant application. Permission is Granted.
2. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of as
withdrawn.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…