Bombay High Court
YUSUF MOHAMMED PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- Dismissed as Withdrawn
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Yusuf Mohammed Patil, filed an anticipatory bail application seeking release in connection with an FIR (Crime No.620/2025) for offences under sections 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Saurabh P. Tandale, later requested unconditional withdrawal of the application, a request that was not opposed by the State’s counsel, Ms. S.N. Deshmukh. The Court, after noting the request, granted leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive consideration of the merits of the bail request was made.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in respect of the offences alleged under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita — s. 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita
Judgment
22-ABA-409-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 409 OF 2026
Yusuf Mohammed Patil … Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Another … Respondents
——————
Mr. Saurabh P. Tandale for the Applicant.
Ms. S.N. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondents-State.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 17th August 2026.
PER COURT :
1. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for the following
relief :
“B) The applicant may kindly be released on anticipatory bail in
connection with the FIR bearing its Crime No.620/2025 registered
with the Police Station, Mangalwedha, District Solapur for an
offence under section 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and for that purpose issue necessary
orders.”
osk 1 of 2
22-ABA-409-2026 (CR).docx
2. Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on
instructions from the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw this Application
unconditionally. This request is not opposed by Ms. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P.
for the Respondents-State.
3. In view of the statement made by Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw this Application for
Anticipatory Bail.
4. The Anticipatory Bail Application No. 409 of 2026 is dismissed as
withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
SHIVAHAR
OMKAR KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.08.17
20:00:18
+0530
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…