Bombay High Court
MD JAVEED SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court allowed anticipatory bail to all applicants, finding no material basis to deny bail and imposing standard conditions.
Summary
The Bombay High Court heard four anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by relatives of the deceased Nargis Faijan Shaikh in a murder case (Crime No. 234 of 2026). The FIR alleged that the deceased was subjected to cruelty by her husband and family members, with the fatal arson occurring on 15.04.2026, while the alleged cruelty against the applicants pertained to incidents in 2024. The State argued that the applicants were involved in the cruelty, whereas the applicants contended that the allegations were vague, unrelated to the 2026 incident, and that similar co‑accused had already been granted bail. The Court found the allegations against the applicants to be omnibus, noted the lack of any direct involvement in the arson, and observed no distinguishing circumstances from the co‑accused who were bailed. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail to all applicants subject to strict conditions, including furnishing a bond, reporting to the investigating officer, and not tampering with evidence.
Issues considered
- Whether the FIR allegations against the applicants constitute a sufficient ground to deny anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether there is a nexus between the alleged cruelty in 2024 and the arson incident of 15.04.2026.
- Whether the applicants should be treated differently from co‑accused who were previously granted bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 80, 85
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- pre‑arrest bail
- Section 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- cruelty
- murder
- FIR
- bail conditions
Judgment
ABA-422-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 422 OF 2026
Humera Furkan Shaikh … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 423 OF 2026
MD Javeed Shaikh … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 424 OF 2026
Shamshadbegam Shaikh … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 425 OF 2026
Furkan M. Javed Shaikh … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
-----
Mr. Ritesh Thobde a/w Rajpurohit Darshan Singh, for the
Applicant.
Mr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory
Bail Application No. 422 of 2026.
Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory Bail
Application Nos. 423 of 2026 and 424 of 2026.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory
Arjun 1
ABA-422-2026.doc
Bail Application No. 425 of 2026.
Mr. Raghvendra Kulkarni, for the Intervenor in Anticipatory Bail
Application Nos. 422 of 2026, 423 of 2026, 424 of 2026 and 425
of 2026.
-------
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 18th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. At the outset, Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the
Applicants, states that these Applications arise out of the FIR
bearing Crime No. 234 of 2026 registered with the Vijapur Naka
Police Station, District Solapur City and therefore requests that all
these Applications be taken up together. This request is not
opposed by Ms. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the Respondent –
State in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 422 of 2026, Mr. N. B.
Patil, learned APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory Bail
Application Nos. 423 of 2026 and 424 of 2026, Mr. S. H. Yadav,
learned APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory Bail
Application No. 425 of 2026 and Mr. Raghvendra Kulkarni,
learned Advocate for the Intervenor in all these Applications. In
view of the same, these Applications are taken up together and
disposed of by a common order.
Arjun 2
ABA-422-2026.doc
2. Heard Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the
Applicants, Ms. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the Respondent –
State in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 422 of 2026, Mr. N. B.
Patil, learned APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory Bail
Application Nos. 423 of 2026 and 424 of 2026, Mr. S. H. Yadav,
learned APP for the Respondent – State in Anticipatory Bail
Application No. 425 of 2026 and Mr. Raghvendra Kulkarni, learned
Advocate for the Intervenor in all these Applications.
3. By these Applications filed under Section 482 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicants seek
pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 234 of 2026
registered at the Vijapur Naka Police Station, District Solapur City,
for offences punishable under Sections 85, 109, 115(2), 352,
351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS,
2023).
4. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicants,
states that there are 8 Accused in Crime No. 234 of 2026. Nargis
Faijan Shaikh is the deceased.
Arjun 3
ABA-422-2026.doc
5. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicants,
states that Faijan Javed Shaikh (Accused No. 1) is the husband of
deceased. Humera Furkan Shaikh (Accused No. 5) is the sister-in-
law of the deceased. MD Javeed Shaikh (Accused No. 2) is the
father-in-law of the deceased. Shamshadbegam Shaikh (Accused
No. 3) is the mother-in-law of the deceased and Furkan M. Javed
Shaikh (Accused No. 4) is the brother-in-law of the deceased.
6. In brief, the prosecution case is that the Nargis Faijan Shaikh
(“deceased”) was married to Accused No. 1. The deceased was
subjected to both physical and mental cruelty at the hands of
Accused No. 1 and his family members, including the Applicants
and three (3) other sisters-in-law of the deceased, viz. Asifa
Shaikh, Ayesha Siddiqua Amin Patel and Taskeen Arif Kazi. On
15.04.2026, Accused No. 1 set the deceased on fire by pouring
petrol with intentions to kill her. The deceased lodged a complaint
on 16.04.2026, which was registered as Crime No. 234 of 2026.
The deceased succumbed to the injuries and consequently, Section
80 of the BNS 2023 was added to Crime No. 234 of 2026.
7. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicants,
Arjun 4
ABA-422-2026.doc
submits that the allegations of cruelty and harassment against the
Applicants, apart from being vague and omnibus, relate to the year
2024, whereas the incident that is the subject matter of the crime
is dated 15.04.2026. He further submits that there is no nexus
between the act committed by the Accused No. 1 on 15.04.2026
and the Applicants.
8. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicants,
submits that on similar and identical facts, Asifa Shaikh (Accused
No. 6) has been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court vide order
dated 14.07.2026 passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 331
of 2026. Taskeen Arif Kazi and Ayesha Siddiqua Amin Patel
(Accused Nos. 7 and 8 respectively) have been granted pre-arrest
bail by this Court vide order dated 28.07.2026 passed in Criminal
Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 377 of 2026 and 378 of 2026
respectively (Exhibit C and D, at page Nos. 44 to 52 of the
Application paper book). He submits that the Applicants are not
involved in the crime and they are willing to co-operate in the
investigation of Crime No. 234 of 2026.
9. Mr. Ritesh Thobde, learned Advocate for the Applicants,
Arjun 5
ABA-422-2026.doc
states that the Applicants do not have any criminal antecedents.
10. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, Mr. N. B. Patil and Mr. S. H. Yadav,
learned APPs in these Applications, submit that the FIR indicates
that the Applicants subjected the deceased to cruelty, resulting in
physical and mental harassment of the deceased. They further
submit that the allegations of the deceased being set on fire by
pouring petrol on 15.04.2026 are against the Accused No. 1 (i.e.
the husband of the deceased).
11. Mr. Raghvendra Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the
Intervenor, by referring to the FIR, submits that the Applicants
have harassed the deceased and that the acts alleged against them
in the FIR constitute cruelty. He submits that although on
15.04.2026, Accused No. 1 poured petrol on the deceased and set
her on fire, the Applicants cannot be said to have no connection
with the mental state the deceased was put in. He therefore
opposes the present Applications.
12. Perused the records with the assistance of the learned
Advocates.
Arjun 6
ABA-422-2026.doc
13. The FIR dated 16.04.2026 reveals that the allegations of
cruelty against the Applicants, Asifa Shaikh, Ayesha Siddiqua Amin
Patel and Taskeen Arif Kazi, relate to incidents dated 07.09.2024
and 08.09.2024.
14. Prima facie, the allegations in the FIR against the Applicants
are omnibus in nature (see Dara Lakshmi Narayana and Others vs.
State of Telangana and Another1 and Kahkashan Kausar alias
Sonam And Others v/s. State of Bihar and Others2) At any rate, the
alleged harassment referred to in the FIR is of the year 2024,
whereas the unfortunate incident occurred on 15.04.2026.
15. The FIR does not indicate that the Applicants were present at
the scene of the incident on 15.04.2026, nor does it make any
allegations against the Applicants of any overt act, such as pouring
petrol or setting the deceased on fire. Allegations regarding the
incident dated 15.04.2026 are against Accused No.1 only.
16. Asifa Shaikh, Taskeen Arif Kazi and Ayesha Siddiqua Amin
Patel (Accused Nos. 6, 7 and 8 in Crime No. 234 of 2026), against
1 (2025) 3 Supreme Court Cases 735.
2 (2022) 6 Supreme Court Cases 599.
Arjun 7
ABA-422-2026.doc
whom the allegations are identical to those of the Applicants, have
been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court. There is no material
placed on record to demonstrate any distinguishing circumstances
that would warrant a different view in the case of the Applicants.
17. Considering the above circumstances, the custodial
interrogation of the Applicants is not necessary.
18. In view of the above, these Applications are allowed on the
following terms:-
(a) In the event of arrest of the Applicants
in the Crime No. 234 of 2026 registered with the
Vijapur Naka Police Station, District Solapur City,
the Applicants shall be released on bail upon each
of the Applicants furnishing a PR bond in the sum
of Rs. 50,000/-, with two sureties in the like
amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating
Officer, Vijapur Naka Police Station, District
Solapur City.
Arjun 8
ABA-422-2026.doc
(b) The Applicants shall not directly or
indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
to any person/s acquainted with the facts of the
case to dissuade such person/s from disclosing the
facts to the Court or any police officer.
(c) Applicants shall not tamper with
evidence in any manner.
(d) Each of the Applicants shall appear and
report to the Investigating Officer at the Vijapur
Naka Police Station, District Solapur City, on 24 th,
25th and 27th August, 2026, from 10:00 am to
12:00 pm, and thereafter as and when required by
the Investigating Officer. Applicants shall
cooperate with the Investigating Officer in the
investigation in Crime No. 234 of 2026.
(e) The Applicants shall provide the
Investigating Officer, Vijapur Naka Police Station,
District Solapur City with their residential address
Arjun 9
ABA-422-2026.doc
along with proof, their contact numbers and must
inform the Investigating Officer of any changes to
this information from time to time.
(f) The Applicant shall regularly appear
before the Trial Court whenever the proceedings
are committed to the Trial Court.
19. The observations made in this order are prima facie and are
meant to assist in deciding the Anticipatory Bail Application.
20. Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application Nos. 422 of 2026, 423
of 2026, 424 of 2026, 425 of 2026 are disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.08.19
22:00:26
+0530
Arjun 10
Checking your session…