Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAJID KHURSHID ALAM SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Anticipatory bail applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Sajid Khurshid Alam Sayyed, filed two anticipatory bail applications before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel informed the court of the intention to withdraw both applications. The court considered the procedural rule that a party may withdraw an anticipatory bail application. No substantive merits were examined as the applications were voluntarily withdrawn. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail applications as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the applicant and, if so, what is the effect on the pending application?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • vacation court

Judgment

                                                             1
                                                                                  4-aba-430-2026.doc

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.430 OF 2026
                                                          WITH
                                       ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.273 OF 2025

                      Sajid Khurshid Alam Sayyed                                 …Applicant
VISHAL                      Versus
SUBHASH
PAREKAR               The State of Maharashtra                                   …Respondent
Digitally signed by
VISHAL SUBHASH
PAREKAR
Date: 2026.05.29
18:10:32 +0530
                                                       ******
                      Mr. Prashant Choudhary a/w. Mr. Dwarkesh Chavda i/b. Mr. Shivam
                      Deshmukh, for the Applicant.
                      Mr. Sagar Agarkar, APP for the State.
                      Mr. Bidgar, PSI, Malvani police station.

                                                         ******
                                                    CORAM : SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.
                                                    DATE    : 29th MAY, 2026
                                                              (VACATION COURT)

                      P.C. :

                      1.          The learned counsel for the Applicants informs the Court that

                      he intends to withdraw both the Anticipatory Bail Applications.


                      2.          Hence, Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                                                 (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)




                      Vishal Parekar                                                                   ….1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.