Bombay High Court
SAJID KHURSHID ALAM SAYYEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Anticipatory bail applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Sajid Khurshid Alam Sayyed, filed two anticipatory bail applications before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel informed the court of the intention to withdraw both applications. The court considered the procedural rule that a party may withdraw an anticipatory bail application. No substantive merits were examined as the applications were voluntarily withdrawn. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail applications as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn by the applicant and, if so, what is the effect on the pending application?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
- vacation court
Judgment
1
4-aba-430-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.430 OF 2026
WITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.273 OF 2025
Sajid Khurshid Alam Sayyed …Applicant
VISHAL Versus
SUBHASH
PAREKAR The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Digitally signed by
VISHAL SUBHASH
PAREKAR
Date: 2026.05.29
18:10:32 +0530
******
Mr. Prashant Choudhary a/w. Mr. Dwarkesh Chavda i/b. Mr. Shivam
Deshmukh, for the Applicant.
Mr. Sagar Agarkar, APP for the State.
Mr. Bidgar, PSI, Malvani police station.
******
CORAM : SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.
DATE : 29th MAY, 2026
(VACATION COURT)
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the Applicants informs the Court that
he intends to withdraw both the Anticipatory Bail Applications.
2. Hence, Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed as
withdrawn.
(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)
Vishal Parekar ….1
Checking your session…