Bombay High Court
TUKARAM VISHWANATH MALI AND AOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
- Bench
- R M JOSHI
Holding
The anticipatory bail application is allowed, subject only to clause ‘B’, as custodial interrogation is not necessary.
Summary
The applicants, Tukaram Vishwanath Mali and another, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (CR No. 56/2025) for alleged illegal sand extraction and transport without a license under Section 303(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. They argued that they had cooperated with the investigation, the tractor seized during the probe had been returned to them by order of the competent court dated 20.03.2025, and therefore custodial interrogation was unnecessary. The respondents opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the alleged offence. The Court examined the relevance of custodial interrogation after the property had been restored and noted the applicants' cooperation. Concluding that further interrogation was not required, the Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, subject only to the exception of clause ‘B’.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants despite the seriousness of the alleged sand‑extraction offence.
- Whether custodial interrogation is necessary after the seized tractor has been returned to the applicants.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 303(1)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 303
- illegal sand extraction
- custodial interrogation
- cooperation with investigation
- seizure and return of property
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:23678
916-ABA-446-2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 446 OF 2025
Tukaram Vishwanath Mali And Another
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. A. S. Gandhi, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, APP for Respondents
...
CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE : JUNE 17, 2026
PC :
1. Applicant apprehends arrest in connection with C.R. No.
56/2025 registered with Police Station Georai, Dist. Beed for the offences
punishable under Sections 303(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. The allegation against the present Applicants and others is of
illegal extracting sand from river bank and transporting the same without
license.
3. Learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that pursuant to
order dated 20.03.2025, Applicants have cooperated in the investigation
and tractor allegedly taken away by the Applicants is already seized and in
fact it is released in favour of Applicants pursuant to order passed by
Competent Court. To support his submissions, he placed reliance on
photocopy of this order.
Page 1 of 2
916-ABA-446-2025.odt
4. Learned APP opposed the application by citing seriousness of
the crime.
5. The custodial interrogation of the Applicants was required only
for the purpose of recovery of tractor. The photocopy of order passed by
learned JMFC, Georai indicates that after seizure of tractor, the same has
been returned to Applicants. As such, custodial interrogation of Applicants is
not necessary. Hence, Application stands allowed in terms of interim order
dated 20.03.2025 except clause no.’B’.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…