Bombay High Court
SHIVAM NANDLAL YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail, finding prima facie merit in the applicant’s claim that he acted solely as an employee and was not involved in any financial transaction, and held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary.
Summary
The applicant, Shivam Nandlal Yadav, an employee of Medex Medical System Company, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in Crime No. 86 of 2026 involving alleged cheating under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the informant was cheated by the company's owner, but the applicant contended he only acted as a sales liaison and did not handle any financial transactions. The court found no material indicating the applicant’s participation in the alleged financial fraud and held that custodial interrogation was unnecessary. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail on condition of a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and imposed standard bail conditions. The application was disposed with the bail order.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant is liable to be arrested in connection with the alleged cheating under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 should be granted to the applicant.
- Whether custodial interrogation of the applicant is necessary in the present case.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 318(4), 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- criminal procedure
- employee liability
- cheating
- bail conditions
- Indian criminal law
Judgment
17 - ABA - 480 - 2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
VAIBHAV
RAMESH CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
JADHAV
Digitally signed by
VAIBHAV RAMESH
JADHAV
Date: 2026.10.07
10:24:17 +0530 CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 480 OF 2026
Shivam Nandlal Yadav … Applicant
Versus.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
--------
Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad with Mr. Samrat hajare for the
Applicant.
Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
A. S. Kanade, Head Constable, Ishwarpur Police Station, is
present.
-------
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 6, 2026
P.C.:
1. Heard, Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Applicant
and Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the State.
2. By the present Application filed under Section 482 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicant seeks pre-
arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 86 of
2026 registered at Islampur Police Station, Sangli, for offences
punishable under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.
3. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states
VRJ 1
17 - ABA - 480 - 2026.doc
that there are three (3) accused in Crime No. 86 of 2026. He submits
that the Applicant is Accused No. 3. Accused No. 1 (Ashwin Raut) is the
owner of Medex Medical System Company. Accused No. 2 (Kundan
Harishchandra Singh) is an employee of Accused No. 1 and so is the
Applicant.
4. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states
that the Applicant (Accused No. 3) is an employee of Accused No. 1,
working in the firm “Medex Medical System Company” of Accused No.
1. He submits that in the course of his duties and on instructions from
Accused No. 1, the Applicant met the Informant (Dr. Sachin
Sangrulkar), who was interested in buying machines dealt in and
supplied by Accused No. 1. He further submits that upon contacting the
Informant, the Applicant informed the Informant about the merchandise
supplied and dealt in by Accused No. 1. Upon the Informant's interest in
purchasing certain machines from Accused No. 1, the Informant directly
dealt with Accused No. 1. To elobarate, Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, states that all the transactions of purchase,
sale and the money transactions are and were between Accused No. 1
and the Informant. He submits that the Applicant has neither dealt with
any money transaction nor has received any amount from the sale of
the machines by Accused No. 1 to the Informant.
5. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the State, submits that the FIR
VRJ 2
17 - ABA - 480 - 2026.doc
discloses that the Applicant was employed by Accused No. 1. She
further submits that Crime No. 86 of 2026, lodged by the Informant,
cleary indicates that the Informant was cheated by Accused No. 1.
6. Perused the records with the assistance of the learned Advocates.
7. The Applicant, being the employee of Accused No. 1, is a fact not
contested by Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the State. Mr. Vaibhav
Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is categorical in his
submission that the Applicant has performed his duties for Accused No.
1 in his capacity as an employee of Accused No. 1 and in no other
capacity.
8. No material is placed in this Application or pointed out to
indicate that the Applicant has been involved in any financial
transaction with the Informant.
9. In view of the above, I find prima facie merit in the submissions
of Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Applicant, that the
Applicant acted as an employee of Accused No. 1 while dealing with the
Informant.
10. In the above circumstances, custodial interrogation of the
Applicant is not necessary in Crime No. 86 of 2026.
11. This Application is, therefore, allowed on the following terms:
VRJ 3
17 - ABA - 480 - 2026.doc
a) In the event of arrest of the Applicant in Crime No. 86 of
2026 registered with Islampur Police Station, Sangli, the
Applicant shall be released on bail upon furnishing a PR bond in
the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, with two sureties in the like amount to
the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, Islampur Police
Station.
b) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person/s acquainted with
the facts of the case to dissuade such person/s from disclosing the
facts to the Court or any police officer.
c) Applicant shall not tamper with evidence in any manner.
d) The Applicant shall appear and report to the Investigating
Officer, Islampur Police Station, on 12 th , 13th , 14th and 15th
October 2026 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and as and when
required by the Investigating Officer. The Applicant shall
cooperate with the Investigating Officer in the process of
investigation of Crime No. 86 of 2026.
12. Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 480 of 2026 is
disposed.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
VRJ 4
Checking your session…