Bombay High Court
HANUMANA RAM LUMBHA RAM KHILERIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Dismissed as Withdrawn
Holding
The court allowed the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and disposed of the application.
Summary
The applicant, Hanumana Ram Lumbha Ram Khileri, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 483 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court seeking bail in connection with a criminal case registered under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The application was heard on 27 August 2026 and was adjourned to 28 August 2026 for the applicant to take further instructions. On 28 August, the applicant’s counsel, Mr. Prasad Kharade, informed the court that the applicant wished to withdraw the application, a request that was not opposed by the State’s counsel. The court, noting the unopposed request, granted leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was disposed of without any order on bail. The judgment was delivered by Justice Ashwin D. Bhope.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in the case involving offences under sections 140(3), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 189(2), 190, 191(2), and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
- Whether the applicant may withdraw the anticipatory bail application at the stage of proceedings.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 115(2), 118(1), 140(3), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- high court
- section 140(3)
- section 118(1)
- section 115(2)
- section 351(2)
- section 352
- section 189(2)
- section 190
- section 191(2)
- section 191(3)
Judgment
957-ABA-483-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 483 OF 2026
Hanumana Ram Lumbha Ram Khileri ...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
__________________________________________________________
Mr. Prasad Kharade, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. Rahul Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 28th August, 2026.
P.C. :
1. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought for
following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a) :-
A. This Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant
Anticipatory bail to the applicants/ accused in connection
with C.R. No. 72 of 2026 registered at Vaduj Police Station
dated 22.07.2026 U/s. 140(3), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2),
352, 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), of Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 on such terms and conditions as deem fit
and proper.
2. This Application was heard on 27.08.2026. At the request of
Mr. Prasad Kharade, learned Advocate for the Applicant, this
Application was adjourned till 28.08.2026, to take instructions
Arjun 1
957-ABA-483-2026.doc
from the Applicant.
3. Mr. Prasad Kharade, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on
instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the
present Application.
4. The request made by Mr. Prasad Kharade, is not opposed by
Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the Respondent – State and Mr.
Rahul Patil, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Prasad Kharade,
learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw
the present Application.
6. Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No. 483 of 2026 is
disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.09.01
11:30:40
+0530
Arjun 2
Checking your session…