Bombay High Court
MANISH @MANISHBHAI GHEVARCHAND SHAH AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Holding
Anticipatory bail is granted to the applicants subject to a personal bond of Rs.30,000 each with sureties and the condition to attend the police station as required.
Summary
The applicants, three individuals, were implicated in a case registered as Crime No.1015 of 2024 under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code. They filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State counsel submitted a summary report against them. The Court examined whether the applicants were entitled to anticipatory bail and, if so, under what conditions. It held that anticipatory bail could be granted, subject to the execution of a personal bond of Rs.30,000 each with one or two sureties of equal amount and a direction to cooperate with the police. The order also required the applicants to appear before the police station whenever required. The application was allowed and disposed of on these terms.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicants are entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances of the case
- Whether conditions such as a personal bond and sureties are appropriate for the grant of anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Indian Penal Code
- Section 409
- Section 420
- Section 467
- Section 468
- Section 471
- Section 120-B
- bail conditions
- criminal procedure
Judgment
12-ABA-488-2026 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 488 OF 2026
1. Manish @manishbhai Ghevarchand Shah
2. Priyanka @ Priyankaben Manish Shah
3. Manoj @ Manojbhai Ghevarchand Shah ….Applicants
Versus
1. The State of Maharashtra
2. Shankar Bajirao Kudale ….Respondents.
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Ranjeet M. Pawar, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 10th JULY, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP for
respondent-State.
2. Learned APP, on instructions, submits that “A” summary report
is filed against the applicants.
3. Considering the submission of learned APP, I pass following
order :
ORDER
(i) In the event of arrest, the applicants be enlarged on bail in
Digitally
signed by
SHUBHADA Crime No.1015 of 2024 registered with Yawat Police Station,
SHUBHADA SHANKAR
SHANKAR KADAM
KADAM Date:
2026.07.13
18:53:09
+0530
Page 1 of 2
12-ABA-488-2026 (CR).doc
Shubhada S Kadam
District Pune, for the offences punishable under Sections 409,
420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the the Indian Penal Code
1860, on executing P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each
with one or two sureties in the like amount.
(ii) The applicants shall attend the concerned police station as and
when required.
The application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is
accordingly disposed of.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…