Bombay High Court
DIPAK PRATAP YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Dipak Pratap Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release on bail if arrested in connection with a criminal case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Samrat S. Hajare, later sought a pass to consult the client and subsequently requested permission to withdraw the application. The State's counsel, Mr. C. D. Mali, did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court considered the request and, finding no objection, granted leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the application was dismissed and recorded as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- What is the procedure for withdrawing an anticipatory bail application before the High Court?
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 118(1), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- High Court
Judgment
1/2
920-ABA-513-2026 (CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 513 OF 2026
Dipak Pratap Yadav …...Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors. …...Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Samrat S. Hajare, for the Applicant.
Mr. C. D. Mali, APP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
Digitally
signed by
SHANTANU
SHANTANU SHANKARSA
P.C.
SHANKARSA DHUDUM
DHUDUM Date:
2026.09.10
20:32:01
+0530
1. Heard Mr. Samrat S. Hajare, learned Advocate for the Applicant
and Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P..P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the
following substantial relief:
“a) That the Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the Applicant
on Bail in the event of arrest in connection with C.R. No.242
of 2026 with Bhuinj Police Station for the offences
punishable u/Sec. 109, 189(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190,
118(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023.”
Shantanu S. Dhudum
2/2
920-ABA-513-2026 (CR).DOC
3. After having heard the matter for sometime, Mr. Samrat S.
Hajare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass over to take
instructions from the Applicant. After sometime, at his request, this
Application was taken up.
4. Mr. Samrat S. Hajare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on
instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present
Application.
5. This request is not opposed by Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P.P. for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Samrat S. Hajare, learned
Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present
Application.
7. Anticipatory Bail Application No.513 of 2026 is dismissed and
disposed of as withdrawn.
( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Shantanu S. Dhudum
Checking your session…