Bombay High Court
KIRANKUMAR KALIDAS PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The Court allowed the applicant to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, disposing of it as withdrawn.
Summary
The applicant, Kirankumar Kalidas Patil, filed an anticipatory bail application seeking pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under IPC Section 420 read with Section 34. The State argued that the alleged offence carried a maximum punishment of seven years and that the investigating officer was complying with the Supreme Court's directive in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. The applicant subsequently requested permission to withdraw the bail application. The Court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in the offence under IPC 420 read with Section 34
- Whether the applicant may withdraw the anticipatory bail application after filing
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 34, 420
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- pre‑arrest bail
- withdrawal
- IPC 420
- criminal procedure
Judgment
10-ABA-533-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 533 OF 2026
Kirankumar Kalidas Patil …... Applicant
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. …...Respondents
——————
Mr. Saurabh P. Tandale for Applicant.
Mr. S.S. Chaudhari, A.P.P. for Respondents-State.
Officer : Mr. G.S. Birkute, Jodbhavi Peth Police Station, present.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 21st September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. By the present Application, the Applicant is seeking pre-arrest bail,
apprehending arrest in Crime No. 616 of 2019, registered with Jodbhavi Peth
Police Station, District Solapur, for the offences punishable under Section 420
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.).
2. At the outset, Mr. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State,
on instructions from the concerned officer, states that the maximum
punishment in Crime No. 616 of 2019 being of seven years, the Investigating
osk 1 of 2
10-ABA-533-2026 (CR).docx
Officer is in the process of complying with the mandate of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v/s. C.B.I.1.
3. In view of the statement made by Mr. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for the
Respondents-State, Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant,
on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present
Application.
4. Leave is granted.
5. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 533 of 2026 is disposed of as
withdrawn.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]
Digitally signed
by OMKAR
SHIVAHAR
OMKAR KUMBHAKARN
SHIVAHAR
KUMBHAKARN Date:
2026.09.21
20:42:38
+0530
1 (2024) 9 SCC 177
osk 2 of 2
Checking your session…