Bombay High Court
SHARAD MADHAV AHIWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court held that, in the absence of any allegation of misappropriation, anticipatory bail could be granted under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Summary
The applicant, a clerk in the Phaltan Municipal Council, was charged in Crime No. 276 of 2026 for issuing a receipt of Rs.2,007 instead of the Rs.20,007 received by cheque for house‑tax and water bills. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, contending that the discrepancy was a clerical error and that the full amount had been deposited in the council’s bank account. The State argued that custodial interrogation was required to ascertain the truth. The Court observed that the prosecution had not alleged any misappropriation or withdrawal of the funds and therefore no case for arrest existed. Accordingly, the Court granted anticipatory bail with a personal bond and a set of reporting and conduct conditions, and disposed of the application.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in the absence of an allegation of misappropriation.
- Whether custodial interrogation is justified when the only allegation is a receipt error.
- Whether the facts disclosed constitute a case for arrest under Sections 316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 316(5), 318(4), 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
- receipt error
- municipal finance
- custodial interrogation
- bail conditions
Judgment
11-ABA-534-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 534 OF 2026
Sharad Madhav Ahiwale … Applicant
Versus.
The State of Maharashtra And Anr. … Respondents
-----
Mr. Rahul Dhaygude (through VC) a/w Preeti Dawada, Advocate for the
Applicant.
Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent – State.
-------
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 21st September, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard, Mr. Rahul Dhaygude, learned Advocate for the Applicant
and Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2. By this Application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail,
apprehending arrest in Crime No. 276 of 2026 registered with the
Phaltan City Police Station for offences punishable under Sections
316(5), 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Mr. Rahul Dhaygude, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits
that there are three (3) Accused in Crime No. 276 of 2026 and that the
Applicant is Accused No. 2.
Arjun 1
11-ABA-534-2026.doc
4. Mr. Rahul Dhaygude, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits
that the Applicant is employed as a Clerk in the Phaltan Municipal
Council. He submits that the allegations against the Applicant are that
the House-tax payers who paid the amount towards house tax and
water bills by cheque have not been properly acknowledged by the
Applicant. He submits that the allegations against the Applicant are that
despite receiving a cheque of Rs. 20,007/-, the Applicant has issued a
receipt of Rs. 2,007/-. He states that the said cheque amount was
deposited in the Bank Account of the Phaltan Municipal Council and
that there was no misappropriation of the said amount. He further
submits that it may have been an error, due to which the Applicant
issued a receipt for Rs. 2,007/- instead of Rs. 20,007/-. He submits that
there are no other allegations against the Applicant.
5. Mrs. S. N. Deshmukh, learned APP for the Respondent – State,
submits that although the Applicant received Rs. 20,007/- by cheque,
the Applicant issued a receipt for Rs. 2,007/- only. She submits that
custodial interrogation of the Applicant is required in this regard.
6. Perused the records with the assistance of the learned Advocates
for the parties.
Arjun 2
11-ABA-534-2026.doc
7. Apparently, the cheque for Rs. 20,007/-, issued by the House-tax
payer, is in the name of the Phaltan Municipal Council. The statement
made by Mr. Rahul Dhaygude, learned Advocate for the Applicant, that
the said cheque amount of Rs. 20,007/- stands deposited and credited
in the account of Phaltan Municipal Council is not disputed by Mrs. S.
N. Deshmukh, learned APP. As per the allegations in Crime No. 276 of
2026, the Applicant ought to have issued a receipt for Rs. 20,007/-,
however, the Applicant has issued a receipt for Rs. 2,007/-. The
prosecution has not alleged that the Applicant misappropriated the said
cheque amount or withdrew it from the Bank.
8. No case is made out for custodial interrogation of the Applicant in
Crime No. 276 of 2026, particularly in the absence of allegations that
the Applicant misappropriated the said cheque amount of Rs. 20,007/-
of Phaltan Municipal Council.
9. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Application is
allowed on the following conditions :-
(a) In the event of the arrest of the Applicant in
Crime No. 276 of 2026 registered with Phaltan City
Police Station, the Applicant shall be released on bail
Arjun 3
11-ABA-534-2026.doc
upon furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 10,000/- with one or
two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of
the Investigating Officer of Phaltan City Police Station.
(b) Applicant shall appear and report to the
Investigating Officer, Phaltan City Police Station, on
28th, 29th and 30th September, 2026, from 10:00 am to
12:00 noon and thereafter as and when required by
the Investigating Officer in Crime No. 276 of 2026.
The Applicant shall cooperate with the investigation in
Crime No. 276 of 2026.
(c) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat or promise to any person/s
acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade such
person/s from disclosing the facts to the Court or any
police officer.
(d) Applicant shall not tamper with evidence in any
manner.
(e) Applicant shall provide the Investigating Officer
with his residential address along with proof, his
Arjun 4
11-ABA-534-2026.doc
contact number, email and must inform the
Investigating Officer of any changes to this
information from time to time.
10. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 534 of 2026 is disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
ARJUN Digitally
KRISHN signed by
ARJUN
A KRISHNA
RODGE RODGE
Date:
2026.09.22
10:34:58
+0530
Arjun 5
Checking your session…