Bombay High Court
ZEESHAN JAAN MOHAMMAD SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- R M JOSHI
Holding
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant was already arrested.
Summary
The petitioner, Zeeshan Jaan Mohammad Shaikh, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 554 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The applicant was already in police custody at the time of filing. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application had become infructuous because of the existing arrest. The court examined whether an anticipatory bail petition can proceed when the applicant is already detained. Finding that the purpose of anticipatory bail is to preempt arrest, the court held that the petition was moot. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Can an anticipatory bail application be entertained when the applicant is already in custody?
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- infructuous
- criminal procedure
- bail jurisdiction
- custody
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:24235
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 554 OF 2026
Zeeshan Jaan Mohammad Shaikh
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. Pranav Dhakne h/f Mr. A. N. Sabnis, Advocate for applicant
Ms. P. J. Bharad, APP for respondent-State
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 22nd JUNE, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that since the
applicant is already arrested, application has become infructuous.
2. In view of the same, application stands dismissed as
infructuous.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
B. S. Joshi
2-ABA-554-2026.odt 1 of 1
Checking your session…