Bombay High Court
ASHISH DADASO ANUSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The Court held that the allegations do not warrant custodial interrogation and therefore granted anticipatory bail.
Summary
The applicant, Ashish Dadaso Anuse, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 238 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420 and 406. The FIR alleges that the informant invested Rs 10 lakhs with the applicant, who allegedly returned Rs 15,62,593, resulting in an excess payment of Rs 5,62,593, and also mentions amounts owed by a third person, Satish Jadhav, who is not a complainant. The State contended that the applicant had not repaid the invested amount, while the applicant argued that he had fully complied and would cooperate with the investigation. The Court examined the FIR and found that the allegations did not justify custodial interrogation or arrest. Consequently, the Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions including a personal bond, reporting to the investigating officer, and prohibitions against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The application was disposed of with bail granted.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for alleged offences of cheating and criminal breach of trust.
- Whether the FIR allegations constitute sufficient ground for arrest and custodial interrogation.
- Whether the applicant poses a risk of tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 406, 420
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 482
- cheating
- criminal breach of trust
- IPC
- bail conditions
- investigation cooperation
Judgment
34-ABA-560-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 560 OF 2026
Ashish Dadaso Anuse ...Applicant
Versus.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
-----
Mr. Sarang Aradhye a/w Dnyaneshwari Utpat and Shantanu Gurav,
Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for the Respondent – State.
-------
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 28th September, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr. Sarang Aradhye, learned Advocate for the Applicant
and Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
2. By the present Application filed under Section 482 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicant seeks pre-
arrest bail, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 238 of 2026 registered at
Vishrambag Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 420
and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
3. Mr. Sarang Aradhye, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states
that the Applicant is the sole accused in Crime No. 238 of 2026.
Arjun 1
34-ABA-560-2026.doc
4. Mr. Sarang Aradhye, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states
that the allegations against the Applicant in the FIR in Crime No. 238 of
2026, filed by the Informant (Sunil Balasaheb Salgar), are that the
Informant, at the assurance of good returns, invested Rs. 8 lakhs with
the Applicant. He submits that the Applicant has, in fact, abided by his
assurance and has paid Rs. 15,62,593/- towards the investment made
by the Informant (i.e., of Rs. 10 lakhs). He states that no amount is
payable to the Informant. He therefore submits that no case has been
made out against the Applicant.
5. Mr. Sarang Aradhye, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on
instructions from the Applicant, states that the Applicant shall cooperate
with the investigation in Crime No. 238 of 2026 and shall appear before
the Investigating Officer at Vishrambag Police Station as and when
required.
6. Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned APP for the Respondent – State,
submits that the allegations against the Applicant relate to non-payment
of the amounts invested with the Applicant.
7. Perused the records with the assistance of the learned Advocates
for the parties.
Arjun 2
34-ABA-560-2026.doc
8. A perusal of the FIR in Crime No. 238 of 2026 indicates that the
Informant (Sunil Balasaheb Salgar) claims to have paid Rs. 10 lakhs to
the Applicant. The FIR itself records the Informant's statement that the
Applicant has returned Rs. 15,62,593/- in respect of the said amount of
Rs. 10 lakhs. Thus, the FIR indicates that an amount of Rs. 5,62,593/-
has been paid in excess of the amount received by the Applicant.
9. The FIR refers to amounts owed by another person (Satish
Jadhav) that the Applicant has not repaid. As on date, Satish Jadhav has
neither filed any complaint nor made any grievance regarding any
amounts invested with the Applicant or their non-return. Satish Jadhav
is not the Complainant in Crime No. 238 of 2026.
10. Be that as it may, for the above reasons, the allegations against
the Applicant in Crime No. 238 of 2026 do not warrant custodial
interrogation.
11. In view of the above, this Application is allowed on the following
conditions :-
(a) In the event of arrest of the Applicant in Crime
No. 238 of 2026, registered with Vishrambag Police
Station, the Applicant shall be released on bail upon
Arjun 3
34-ABA-560-2026.doc
furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one or
two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of
the Investigating Officer of Vishrambag Police Station.
(b) Applicant shall appear and report to the
Investigating Officer, Vishrambag Police Station, on
5th, 6th and 7th October, 2026 from 10:00 am to 1.00
p.m. and thereafter, as and when required by the
Investigating Officer, in Crime No. 238 of 2026. The
Applicant shall co-operate with the investigation in
Crime No. 238 of 2026.
(c) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make
any inducement, threat or promise to any person/s
acquainted with the facts of the case to dissuade such
person/s from disclosing the facts to the Court or any
police officer.
(d) Applicant shall not tamper with evidence in any
manner.
(e) Applicant shall provide the Investigating Officer
with his residential address along with proof, his
Arjun 4
34-ABA-560-2026.doc
contact number, email and must inform the
Investigating Officer of any changes to this
information from time to time.
12. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 560 of 2026 is disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.09.28
21:33:05
+0530
Arjun 5
Checking your session…