Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SARJERAO SOMNATH LOKAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposal
Rejected

Holding

An anticipatory bail application is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution where the applicant remains absent and unrepresented for successive dates.

Summary

This is an anticipatory bail application filed by Sarjerao Somnath Lokare against the State of Maharashtra. The application was listed before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, on 18th November 2025. When the matter was called, none appeared for the applicant. The Court noted that the applicant had remained absent for the last four dates. Counsel for the intervenor and the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State were heard. The Court therefore dismissed the application for non-prosecution. No adjudication on the merits of the anticipatory bail plea was undertaken.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail application can be proceeded with or entertained when the applicant remains absent and unrepresented on successive dates?

Subjects

  • Anticipatory Bail
  • Non-Prosecution
  • Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Absence of Applicant
  • Dismissal

Judgment

                                                                               132-ABA-843-2025 (CR).DOC



                                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                  CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 843 OF 2025

                        Sarjerao Somnath Lokare                        ...Applicant
                              Versus
                        The State of Maharashtra                       ...Respondent
                                                               …..
                        None for Applicant.
                        Mr. A. S. Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent-State.
                        Ms. Vedantika Naik a/w Mr. Ravindra Kadam, for the Intervenor.
                        Mr. Nilesh Tara, API, Karad City Police Station – present.
                                                               …..

                                                     CORAM       :     SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                     DATE        :     18th NOVEMBER, 2025
                        P.C.

                        1.             None present for the Applicant.

                        2.             Heard learned counsel for Intervenor and learned APP for

                        the Respondent-State.

                        3.             It appears that for last four dates, none present for the

                        Applicant. The Application is dismissed for non-prosecution.




                                                                             (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




           Digitally
           signed by
           SAJAKALI
SAJAKALI   LIYAKAT
LIYAKAT    JAMADAR
JAMADAR    Date:
           2025.11.19
           20:14:50
           +0530                                         Page 1 of 1
                        Sajakali Jamadar


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.