Bombay High Court
SAMADHAN SURESH YEDE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to Applicant No. 2 with conditions, finding that the delayed FIR did not sufficiently implicate the applicants in the alleged grievous injury.
Summary
The applicants, Samadhan Suresh Yede and Mahesh (Anna), sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 239/2026, which alleged assault causing grievous injury to an informant. The FIR was lodged more than 30 days after the incident, and the applicants argued that the delay indicated a counter‑blast and that they were not responsible for the injury. The State opposed bail, contending that the injury was real and the FIR was timely in view of the informant’s hospitalization. The court noted the delay in filing the FIR and the possibility of over‑implication, finding insufficient basis to attribute the grievous injury to the applicants. Consequently, the court confirmed interim protection for Applicant No. 1 and granted anticipatory bail to Applicant No. 2 subject to strict conditions, including a personal bond and non‑interference with witnesses.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the FIR is lodged after a delay of more than 30 days.
- Whether the applicants can be held liable for the grievous injury alleged in the FIR.
- Whether the conditions imposed on bail are appropriate under the circumstances.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhiata — s. 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 3(5), 352
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- delay in FIR
- over‑implication
- grievous injury
- bail conditions
- criminal procedure
Judgment
-1-
aba848.26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 848 OF 2026
1. Samadhan Suresh Yede
2. Mahesh @ Anna s/o Mohan Yede ….Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent
…..
Mr. M. U. Shelke, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for the State.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 8th SEPTEMBER, 2026.
PER COURT :
1. Applicants seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.
239/2026 registered with Bhoom Police Station, Tq. Bhoom, District
Dharashiv, for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1),
118(2), 352, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhiata.
2. First Information Report indicates that an incident had
occurred on 08.04.2026 in which the present Applicants with co-
accused said to have caused assault on the informant resulting into
causing of grievous injury in the form of fracture to his ribs.
-2-
aba848.26.odt
3. Learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that this is a case
wherein already report is lodged by Applicant No. 2 in respect of the
incident occurred on the same day in which he was assaulted by the
informant. It is his submission that the present report is belatedly
lodged i.e. after 30 days of occurrence of the incident by way of
counter blast. It is his submission that in any case, no grievous
injury is attributable to the present Applicants and as such, their
liberty deserves to be protected. He makes a statement on
instructions that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court to
Applicant No. 1 of causing appearance before the Investigating
Officer, he has appeared before the Investigating Officer and
cooperated in the investigation.
4. Learned APP opposed grant of protection to the Applicants by
referring to the allegations against them in the First Information
Report. It is his submission that on account of injury caused to the
informant he was hospitalised which is a satisfactory explanation for
beletedly lodging of the report.
5. Prima facie perusal of the record indicates that on 08.04.2026
certainly some incident has occurred. There is already report lodged
-3-
aba848.26.odt
by Applicant No. 2 in connection with the said incident. The report
in question is lodged after 30 days. Once there is delay in lodging of
the report, the Court has to be very careful with regard to assessing
allegations made therein as the possibility of over implication exists.
Perusal of record though indicates causing of injury including
grievous injury i.e. fracture to ribs to the informant, said injury is not
attributable to the present Applicants. in the facts of the case,
interim protection granted to Applicant No. 1 stands confirmed except
Clause No. (ii) and application is allowed qua Applicant No. 2 in
following terms.
ORDER
(i) In the event of arrest of Applicant No. 2 Mahesh
@ Anna s/o Mohan Yede, in connection with Crime No.
239/2026 registered with Bhoom Police Station, Tq.
Bhoom, District Dharashiv, for the offences punishable
under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 352, 3(5) of
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhiata, he be released on bail on
furnishing PR Bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rs. Fifteen
Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount.
(ii) He shall attend the concerned police station as
and when called.
-4-
aba848.26.odt
(iii) He shall not contact the witnesses directly or
indirectly.
(iv) He shall not interfere with the evidence in any
manner whatsoever.
(v) He is further directed to cooperate the
investigating agency for further investigation.
(vi) Learned APP to communicate this order to the
concerned Investigating Officer.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
dyb
Checking your session…