Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

DILIP SHRIRAM KALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application.

Summary

Arjun Vitthal Kudhekar filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, indicated that a notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) would be issued to the applicant. In response, the applicant’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court permitted the withdrawal and ordered the application to be disposed of, while expressly leaving all substantive merits open for future consideration.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn when a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS is being issued to the applicant

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • notice
  • BNSS
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                              43-ABA-85-2026.doc


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                  ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.85 OF 2026
         Digitally
         signed by
         ARJUN        Dilip Shriram Kale                                    ...Applicant
ARJUN    VITTHAL
         KUDHEKAR
VITTHAL
KUDHEKAR Date:
                               Versus
         2026.08.18
         22:04:44     The State of Maharashtra                              ...Respondent
         +0530

                                                    ——————
                      Mr. Vinayak R. Kumbhar, for the Applicant.
                      Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP, for the Respondent-State.
                      API B. S. Gurav, Yewalewadi Police Station, Kondhwa Budruk, Pune,
                      present.
                                                    ——————
                                                       Coram: Madhav J. Jamdar, J.
                                                       Date: August 17, 2026
                      P.C.:

                      1.      Heard Mr. Kumbhar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

                      and Mr. Ghag, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

                      2.      Mr. Ghag, learned APP, on instructions, submits that a notice

                      under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

                      (“BNSS”), will be issued to the Applicant and the procedure will be

                      followed.

                      3.      Considering the submission of the learned APP, Mr. Kumbhar,

                      learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to

                      withdraw the Anticipatory Bail Application, as a notice under Section

                      35(3) of the BNSS is being issued to the Applicant.

                      4.      The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and

                      disposed of.


                      Arjun                               1
                                                         43-ABA-85-2026.doc


5.      All contentions on merits are expressly kept open.



                                                 [Madhav J. Jamdar, J.]




Arjun                               2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.