Bombay High Court
JAYA VINOD KAKADEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED
Holding
The court held that anticipatory bail must be granted as custody is not required for the investigation, subject to specified conditions.
Summary
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging forgery and cheating involving false documents and signatures, amounting to a loss of Rs. 14,10,537. The applicant, a staff member of a gas agency, claimed he had previously complained against the manager and had cooperated with the investigation, asserting no overt act on his part. The State argued that the applicant, as a subordinate, was involved in the alleged offences and that custodial interrogation was necessary to obtain bank records and other documents. The court examined the nature of the offences, noting that the investigation primarily required documentary evidence which could be obtained without custody, and observed the applicant's cooperation and prior interim protection. Consequently, the court confirmed anticipatory bail with a cash bond of Rs. 25,000, a surety, and conditions including attendance at police stations and non‑interference with evidence, and ordered the application disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant under Section 438 CrPC given the alleged offences.
- Whether custodial interrogation is necessary for the investigation of alleged forgery and cheating.
- Whether conditions can be imposed on the grant of anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438
- Indian Penal Code — s. 34, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477-A
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- pre‑arrest bail
- forgery
- cheating
- documentary evidence
- co‑operation with investigation
- bail conditions
- cash bond
Judgment
1-ABA- 950 of 2024.docx
Harish
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 950 OF 2024
Jaya Vinod Kakade ...Applicant
V/s.
State Of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondent
_____________________________________________________________
Adv. Vinod D. More, for the Applicant.
Adv. Megha S. Bajoriya, APP for the Respondent – State.
PSI - Archana Jadhav, Virar Police Station is Present.
_________________________________________________________
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP
for the respondent-State.
2. The applicant has filed the instant application under
Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.), 1973 for
seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 678 of 2023
registered with Virar Police Station, for the offence punishable under
Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 477-A read with section 34 of Indian
Penal Code (IPC), 1860 .
1/5
1-ABA- 950 of 2024.docx
3. The FIR is registered on the basis of allegations made by
the complainant alleging that this applicant along with accused No. 1
prepared false and bogus documents by making false signatures of
customers in gas agency and cheated the complainant’s gas agency for
an amount of Rs. 14,10,537/-. (Rupees Fourteen Lakh Ten Thousand
Five Hundred Thirty-Seven).
4. The learned counsel for applicant submits that the
applicant was working as a staff in the Abir HP Gas Agency of which
Jiyad Shaikh was the Manager. It is submitted that as a matter of fact,
the applicant had made a prior complaint against the co-accused i.e.
Manager of the agency in the month of July, 2022 itself, even before
the FIR came to be lodged. He submits that there is nothing to indicate
that this applicant has committed any overt act and there are general
allegations against this applicant. Apart from this, it is pointed out that
the co-accused was granted interim protection by order dated
04.10.2023 and by ABA No. 2720 of 2023, and considering the
minimal role fo this applicant, the instant application be allowed. He
also states that in accordance with the interim protection granted to this
applicant by order dated 09.05.2024, he has extended the co-operation
during investigation and therefore prays for confirmation of the interim
2/5
1-ABA- 950 of 2024.docx
protection.
5. Learned APP had opposed the application by stating that
applicant was working as a employee of gas agency and was
subordinate to accused no.1. It is alleged in the FIR that both the
accused used to show online gas booking without giving information to
customers and they used to prepare transfer vouchers by making false
signatures of customers and further they have received certain
amounts. Considering the nature of offence, custodial interrogation of
this applicant is necessary for collecting their bank transactions and
other documents.
6. Perused the FIR and documents placed on record. The
allegations in the FIR are about preparing false and bogus documents
by making false signatures of customers in gas agency. It has to be
noted that the FIR is registered against the manager, to whom
anticipatory bail is already granted. In view of the fact that the
investigation has to be conducted with regard to allegations of forgery,
the same can be conducted on the basis of available documents.
Considering the nature of offence, the investigation is primarily related
to documentary evidence, which can be collected by calling upon the
3/5
1-ABA- 950 of 2024.docx
applicant to produce them. As such, for the purpose of collecting
documentary evidence, custody of the applicants is not necessary.
Also, the applicant has extended co-operation in accordance with
interim protection granted by this Court.
7. Considering all above aspects, the personal liberty of this
applicant needs to be protected and therefore, the interim protection
granted to the applicant needs to be confirmed, subject to certain
conditions.
8. Hence, I pass the following order:
:ORDER:
i] The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed.
ii] In the event of arrest of the applicant in Crime
No. 678 of 2023 registered with Virar Police
Station, for offence punishable under Sections 420,
465, 467, 468, 471, 477-A read with section 34 of
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). she be released on
bail on furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one
solvent surety of the like amount.
4/5
1-ABA- 950 of 2024.docx
iii] The applicant is directed to attend the police
station as and when called upon by the
Investigating Agency.
iv] The applicant shall cooperate with the
Investigating agency during investigation and
trial.
v] The applicant shall not tamper with the
prosecution evidence or influence the informant
and witnesses directly or indirectly.
vi] Breach of any of these conditions would be a
ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail.
9. In view of this, the instant Anticipatory Bail Application
is allowed and disposed of.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
5/5
Checking your session…