Bombay High Court
KRISHANA W/O. SANDEEP BARDAWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ABHAY S WAGHWASE
Holding
The application for cancellation of bail is dismissed as infructuous because the main case is already concluded.
Summary
Krishana filed an application seeking cancellation of bail (No. 150 of 2019) in a criminal case. Respondent No.3, appearing via video conference, informed the court that the substantive case had already been decided and there was no pending issue. The court, noting the submission that the matter was already concluded, found no ground to entertain the bail cancellation application. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the application for cancellation of bail should be entertained when the main case has already been decided
Subjects
- bail
- cancellation of bail
- infructuous application
- application dismissed
Judgment
980-ACB-150-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
980 APPLICATION FOR CANCELLATION OF BAIL NO. 150 OF
2019
IN BA/1028/2019
KRISHANA W/O. SANDEEP BARDAWAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
.…
Ms Maya R. Jamdhade, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. V. S. Badakh, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State
Mr. U. S. Malte, Advocate for Respondent No.3 (through VC)
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : July 07, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 appearing
through video conferencing submits that the case is already
decided and no remains in the matter.
2. In view of above, the application is disposed off as
infructuous.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Checking your session…