Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NADEEM MOHAMMED CHAND SHAIKHversusSAYYED AHMED GULAM MOHAMMED

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the parties' failure to appear.

Summary

The appellant, Nadee​m Chand, filed an appeal against an order dated 2023. The matter was listed for hearing on 11th March 2026, but no party appeared. The hearing was adjourned to 18th March 2026, and again no party appeared. The Court, noting the continuous non‑appearance, dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Consequently, any pending interim applications and orders within the appeal were vacated.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when parties fail to appear for a scheduled hearing in an appeal?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • appeal
  • want of prosecution
  • dismissal
  • interim application

Judgment

                                                                                                          17-AO-1011-2023
                                                                                      Nadeem Chand Vs. Sayyed Ahmed Gulam


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1011 OF 2023
                                                   WITH
                                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17966 OF 2023
                                                    IN
                                    APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 1011 OF 2023

       Nadeem Mohammd Chand Shaikh                                                         … Appellant
            V/s.
       Sayyed Ahmed Gulam Mohammed                                                         … Respondent

                                   _______________________________________

       None for the parties
                                   _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

                                                     DATE : 18th MARCH 2026
       P. C.:

       1.                   On the last occasion viz., 11th March 2026, none appeared for

       the parties and therefore, the matter was stood over to today for dismissal.

       2.                   Despite this, none appears for the parties even today.

       3.                   Considering this, this Court is constrained to dismiss the Appeal

       from Order for want of prosecution.

       4.                   All pending Interim Applications taken out in the present

       Appeal from Order, if any, also stand disposed of in terms of this order, and

       all interim orders passed therein, if any, shall stand vacated.


                                                                            ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )
       Jyoti Pawar

                Digitally signed
JYOTI   by JYOTI
        PRAKASH
                                                          Page 1 of 1
PRAKASH PAWAR                                 -------------------------------------
PAWAR   Date: 2026.03.23
        16:00:46 +0530
                                               Order dated 18th March 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.