Bombay High Court
MR. RAMESH NAGESH PARSEKARversusSAMEER FAZLE KADAR KHAN AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
The order is to be read as also disposing any civil application, if any, that was pending.
Summary
The appellant, Ramesh Nagesh Parsekar, appealed an order (No. 214 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court. The Registry noted that while the appeal from the order had been disposed of, a related civil application remained pending. The Court held that the order should be read to include that any civil application, if present, is also deemed disposed of. Consequently, the pending civil application was considered closed. The appeal was therefore dismissed, and the order was clarified to cover both matters.
Issues considered
- Whether the order disposing the appeal should also be interpreted to dispose the pending civil application
Subjects
- appeal
- civil application
- order interpretation
- high court
- disposal
Judgment
1/1 8-AO-214-2018 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 214 OF 2018
Mr. Ramesh Nagesh Parsekar ...Appellant
Versus
Sameer Fazle Kadar Khan And Anr ...Respondents
_______
Adv. Eshwaree Kudalkar i/b Suraj Kudalkar for the Appellant.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 9th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C.
1. This matter was placed on Board by the Registry today, since it is pointed
out that though the Appeal From Order was disposed of, the Civil Application
remain to be disposed of, hence, the Order should be read as “Civil Application if
any shall also stand disposed of.”
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…