Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. KUSUM POWER CONTROL CABLE CO. MANUFACTURING THR. PROPRIETOR MR. D. K. BHANDARIversusM/S. FINOLEX CABLES LIMITED, PUBLIC LIMITED

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

M/s. Kusum Power Control Cable Co. filed an appeal before the Bombay High Court. The Court noted on 9 January 2026 that no counsel for either party had appeared. It warned that failure to appear would lead to dismissal for want of prosecution. On 23 January 2026, still no party appeared before the Court. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and disposed of any pending interim applications. The decision rests on the Court's inherent power to manage its docket and ensure timely prosecution of appeals.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the parties?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • appeal
  • want of prosecution
  • non-appearance
  • dismissal
  • high court

Judgment

                                                                                         41. AO 330.2021
                                                                                M/s. Kusum Power Control vs. M/s. Finolex Cables

            Digitally signed
JYOTI   by JYOTI
        PRAKASH
PRAKASH PAWAR                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PAWAR   Date: 2026.01.27
        15:41:08 +0530                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 330 OF 2021

            M/s. Kusum Power Control Cable Co.                                                  … Appellant
                       V/s.
            M/s. Finolex Cables Limited                                                         … Respondent
                                  _______________________________________

            None for the parties
                            _______________________________________

                                                  CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

                                                  DATE                 : 23rd JANUARY 2026

            P.C. :

            1.                 By an order dated 9th January 2026, this Court had recorded

            that none appeared for the parties and accordingly, notice was given that if

            parties do not remain present today, this Court would have no other option

            but to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution.


            2.                 Despite this, none appears for the parties today.                              Accordingly,

            this Court has no other option but to dismiss the Appeal for want of

            prosecution.         All pending Interim Applications therein, if any, also stand

            disposed of in terms of the above order.



                                                                                 ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )
            Jyoti Pawar


                                                            Page 1 of 1
                                                -------------------------------------
                                                Order dated 23rd January 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.