Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

ISMAIL ABDUL AZIZ SHAIKHversusMUMBAI HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The appellant, Ismail Abdul Aziz Shaikh, filed an appeal against the Mumbai Housing and Area Development Authority. No parties appeared before the Court on the scheduled dates, including the hearing on 10 February 2026 and the subsequent date. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. The order also vacated any interim reliefs that might have been granted. No substantive merits of the case were addressed due to the procedural default.

Issues considered

  • Can an appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution when parties fail to appear?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • appeal dismissal
  • want of prosecution
  • interim relief vacated

Judgment

                                                                                           7. AO. 346.2021
                                                                                        Ismail Shaikh vs. MHADA


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 346 OF 2021
                                              WITH
                              INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3004 OF 2021

         Ismail Abdul Aziz Shaikh                                                  … Appellant/Applicant
                   V/s.
         Mumbai Housing and Area
         Development Authority                                                     … Respondents
                             _______________________________________

         None for the Parties.
                         _______________________________________

                                              CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

                                              DATE                : 17th FEBRUARY 2026
         P.C. :

         1.               None for the parties. On the last occasion viz. 10 th February

         2026, none had appeared for the parties and hence, the matter was stood

         over to today for dismissal.


         2.               Considering that none appears even today, this Court is

         constrained to dismiss the Appeal for want of prosecution.


         3.               Pending Interim Applications, if any, shall stand disposed of and

         interim reliefs, if any, shall stand vacated in terms of this order.



                                                              ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )
         Jyoti Pawar


JYOTI   Digitally signed
        by JYOTI
                                                       Page 1 of 1
PRAKASH PRAKASH     PAWAR
                                           -------------------------------------
        Date: 2026.02.20                   Order dated 17th February 2026
PAWAR   15:35:11 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.