Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAVINDER SINGH T. SETHI AND OTHERSversusTHE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal, disposing of it and vacating any interim orders while disposing of pending interim applications.

Summary

The appellants, Ravinder Singh Sethi and others, filed an appeal against orders dated 2023 in an interim application before the Bombay High Court. Their counsel, Mr. Jagdish Jayale, sought leave to withdraw the appeal. The Court, after considering the request, disposed of the appeal as withdrawn. It further ordered that any pending interim applications, if any, stand disposed. All interim orders previously passed in the matter were directed to stand vacated. The order was pronounced by Justice Farhan P. Dubash on 8 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal pending before the High Court can be withdrawn at the request of the appellant.
  • What is the effect of withdrawal of an appeal on pending interim applications and interim orders.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • interim application
  • vacating orders
  • Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                                                                                                   905.AO 654.2023
                                                                                       Ravinder Singh Sethi vs. MCGM


                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                     APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 654 OF 2023
                                                     IN
                                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14412 OF 2023
                                                     IN
                                     APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 654 OF 2023

  Ravinder Singh T. Sethi and Ors.                                                    … Appellants
            V/s.
  The Municipal Corporation of Greater
  Mumbai and Ors.                                                                     … Respondents
                  _______________________________________
  Mr. Jagdish Jayale a/w. Mr. Jayesh Jayale for the Appellants
  Mr. Sunny Shah a/w. Mr. Viral Dilip Shukla a/w. Ms. Priti Shukla a/w. Mr.
  Yash Kataria and Mr. Rudra M. Dani i/b. Shukla & Associates for Respondent
  no.4
  Ms. Akanksha G. Bobhate i/b. Y.S. Bhate for Respondent no. 8
                  _______________________________________

                                                CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

                                                DATE                 : 8th APRIL 2026
  P.C. :

  1.                     Mr. Jagdish Jayale, learned Counsel appearing for the

  Appellants, on instructions from his clients seeks leave to withdraw the

  present Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

  2.                     All pending Interim Applications filed therein, if any, also stand

  disposed of in terms of this order, and all interim orders passed therein, if

  any, shall stand vacated.

                                                                       ( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. )
  Jyoti Pawar

                Digitally signed
JYOTI   by JYOTI
        PRAKASH
                                                          Page 1 of 1
PRAKASH PAWAR                                 -------------------------------------
PAWAR   Date: 2026.04.09
        10:51:31 +0530
                                                Order dated 8th April 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.