Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SURESH RAMRAO DESHMUKHversusMAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPEMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)

Decided
Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The appeal may be withdrawn at the request of the appellant, and the court allowed the withdrawal.

Summary

The appellant, Suresh Ramrao Deshmukh, filed an appeal against an order of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA). During the proceedings, counsel for the appellant submitted a request to withdraw the appeal. The court considered whether such a withdrawal was permissible at that stage. The judge allowed the withdrawal, ordering that the appeal stand disposed of as withdrawn without any costs. Consequently, the pending interim application was also disposed of in accordance with the withdrawal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant may withdraw the appeal at the stage of the proceedings?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • civil procedure
  • appellate jurisdiction
  • court order
  • costs

Judgment

                                                                                  505-AO-878-26 WITH IA.DOC

 JYOTI
 RAJESH
 MANE                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed
by JYOTI
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
RAJESH MANE
Date: 2026.08.24
10:54:29 +0530

                                   APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 878 OF 2026
                                                 WITH
                                 INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO.9347 OF 2025
                                                   IN
                                   APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 878 OF 2026


                   Suresh Ramrao Deshmukh                                ...Appellant
                         Versus
                   Maharashtra Housing and Area
                   Development Authority (MHADA)                         ...Respondents

                                                      _______
                   Ms. Bhagyashree Gawas i/b. Mr. C.K.Tripathi, for Applicant/Appellant.
                   Mr. Murlidharan Kalathil, i/b. P.G.Lad , for Respondents.
                                                        _______

                                              CORAM:          AARTI SATHE, J.

                                              DATE:           21 AUGUST 2026

                   P.C.

                   1.         Learned counsel on behalf of the Appellant submits on instructions that

                   she seeks to withdraw the aforesaid Appeal from Order.

                   2.         Allowed to be withdrawn.

                   3.         Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.

                   4.         Pending interim application stands disposed of accordingly.




                                                     (AARTI SATHE, J.)




                                                     Page 1 of 1
                   Mane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.