Bombay High Court
KERSI JAMSHED LIMATHWALLAversusDISTRICT GRAND LODGE OF INDIA S.C. THR. ITS SECRETARY NOSHIR PAGHDIWALA AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court, suo moto, corrected the order to reflect the proper interim application number and the correct list of counsel for the appellant.
Summary
The High Court of Bombay, on suo moto basis, noted clerical errors in an earlier order dated 31 August 2026. The errors pertained to the numbering of an interim application and the listing of counsel appearing for the appellant. The court directed that Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected to Interim Application No.6620/2026 and that the names of the advocates for the appellant be substituted as specified. No substantive issues of law or fact were addressed; the correction was purely administrative. The remainder of the original order was left unchanged and the corrected order was to be made available to the parties.
Issues considered
- Whether the court should correct the clerical errors in the order regarding the interim application number and the list of counsel
Subjects
- clerical correction
- court order
- interim application
- suo moto correction
- advocate substitution
Judgment
JYOTI
RAJESH
MANE
Digitally signed by
JYOTI RAJESH
MANE
Date: 2026.09.09
16:10:01 +0530
1/1 4-AO-880-26 SPK.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 880 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6620 OF 2024
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 880 OF 2026
Kersi Jamshed Limathwalla ...Appellant
Versus
District Grand Lodge Of India
S.C. Thr. Its Secretary Noshir
Paghdiwala And Others ...Respondents
_______
CORAM: AARTI SATHE, J.
DATE: 09 SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.:
1 Suo moto called for Speaking to the Minutes of order dated 31 August
2026.
2 The Interim Application No.11988/2024 be corrected as Interim
Application No.6620/2026 in the title of the said order. So also the appearance
of Advocates appearing on behalf of the Appellant be corrected and substituted as
follows:
“Mr. Sharan Jagtiani Senior Advocate a/w. Mr.Karl Tamboly a/w.
Mr.Shanay Shah, Mr. Zerick Dastur, a/w. Mr. Pranav Narsaria, a/w
Mr.Sangram Parab, a/w. Mr. Ryan D’SOuza a/w. Mr. Tejas Popat a/w.
Ms. Mansi Shah i/b. M/s.Pravin Mehta and Mithi & Co., for
Appellant.”
3 Rest of the order remains unaltered. Original order to be corrected and
made available to the parties.
(AARTI SATHE, J.)
Checking your session…