Bombay High Court
JYOTI YUVRAJ DAWARE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DEFAULT AT ADMISSION STAGE
- Bench
- R M JOSHI
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellants, Jyoti Yuvraj Daware & Anr., filed Criminal Appeal No. 1289 of 2022 before the High Court of Bombay, challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The matter was heard by Justice R. M. Joshi, with Mr. S.S. Ghag appearing for the respondent State and no counsel representing the appellants. The court observed that the appellants failed to prosecute the appeal, i.e., they did not present any evidence or arguments to support their case. Consequently, the court found that the appeal could not proceed for want of prosecution. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution?
Subjects
- criminal appeal
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- procedural law
Judgment
11-APEAL-1289-2022.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1289 OF 2022
Jyoti Yuvraj Daware & Anr …Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents
None for the Appellants.
None for Respondent No. 2.
Mr SS Ghag, APP, for Respondent No. 1-State.
SHEPHALI
SANJAY
MORMARE
CORAM: R. M. JOSHI, J.
Digitally signed
by SHEPHALI
SANJAY
MORMARE
Date: 2026.02.06
DATED: 6th FEBRUARY, 2026
18:14:29 +0530
PC:-
1. None for the Appellants.
2. Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
{
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…