Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAI GANESH CO OPERATIVE SOCEITY LTDversusSHIVPUTRA SHANKAR KUDCHE AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is withdrawn and disposed of as such.

Summary

The appellant, Sai Ganesh Co Operative Society Ltd, filed Criminal Appeal No. 1650 of 2011 against Shivputra Shankar Kudche and others. The appellant's counsel informed the court that the matter was settled and the appellant wished to withdraw the appeal. The respondent's counsel confirmed this request. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted leave to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the criminal appeal after filing

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • appellate jurisdiction
  • settlement

Judgment

                                                   20-APEAL-1650-2011 (CR).docx


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                  CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                     CR. APPEAL NO. 1650 OF 2011

Sai Ganesh Co Operative Soceity Ltd                 … Appellant
                     Versus
Shivputra Shankar Kudche And Anr.                   … Respondents


                                  ——————
Mr. Siyal Magdum i/b Umesh Manakapure, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr. Rahul R., i/b Vijay Killedar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.
Mr. C. D. Mali, APP for the Respondent – State.
                                  ——————

                                 Coram :    ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                 Date :     17th September 2026.

PER COURT :


1.      Heard Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, Mr.

Rahul R., learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and Mr. C. D. Mali,

learned APP for the Respondent – State.


2.      Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant, submits that

the subject matter of this Appeal is settled and he has instructions from the

Appellant to withdraw the same.


3.      Mr. Rahul R., learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, confirms the

statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate for the Appellant.



Arjun                               1
                                                                   20-APEAL-1650-2011 (CR).docx


                4.      In view of the statement made by Mr. Siyal Magdum, learned Advocate

                for the Appellant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Appeal.


                5.      Criminal Appeal No. 1650 of 2011 is disposed of as withdrawn.




                                                            [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ]




        Digitally
        signed by
        ARJUN
ARJUN   KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE   Date:
        2026.09.21
        11:14:03
        +0530




                Arjun                               2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.