Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH RAHIM SHAIKH RUSTUMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
Withdrawn

Holding

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellant, Shaikh Rahim Shaikh Rustum, filed a criminal appeal against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. During the pendency of the appeal, the investigating officer filed a charge-sheet before the trial court. The appellant's counsel then sought to withdraw the appeal, stating that the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the appeal unnecessary. The court accepted the withdrawal request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The fees of the appointed counsel for the respondent were ordered to be quantified as per the rules.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • criminal procedure
  • charge-sheet

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:17916
                                                       (1)                 903criapl205.26.odt




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     903 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 205 OF 2026

                                          SHAIKH RAHIM SHAIKH RUSTUM
                                                                                ….Appellant
                                                      VERSUS

                                THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
                                                                 …..Respondent

                Mr. A. C. Sissodiya, Advocate for the Appellant [through VC]
                Mr. V. M. Chate, APP for the Respondents/State
                Mr. B. K. Patil, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 [appointed]

                                                             CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                                               DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2026


                PER COURT :

                1.                 Learned Advocate for the Appellant submitted that

                during the pendency of this appeal, the Investigating Officer filed the

                charge-sheet before the learned Trial Court. As such, on instructions,

                learned Advocate for the Appellant desires to withdraw the Appeal.

                2.                 His statement is accepted.

                3.                 In view of the above, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

                4.                 Fees of the learned Appointed Counsel be quantified as

                per the rules.



                                                                    [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ]

                VishalK/903criapl205.26.odt


                                                                                         1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.