Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VANITA RAMKUMAR MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The appeal was withdrawn and the appellant was ordered to be treated as deemed in custody for the purpose of a regular bail application, which shall be decided on its merits.

Summary

Vanita Ramkumar Mali appealed against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court allowed the withdrawal, directing that if a bail application is filed within three weeks, the appellant shall not be arrested until the bail application is decided. The Court further directed that for the purpose of the bail application the appellant shall be treated as deemed to be in custody, and the bail application shall be decided on its own merits. Accordingly, the appeal was disposed of on these terms.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal pending before the High Court can be withdrawn after the filing of a charge‑sheet.
  • Whether the appellant can be treated as deemed in custody for the purpose of a regular bail application.
  • Whether the High Court can direct that the appellant not be arrested pending the decision of the bail application.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • charge‑sheet
  • regular bail
  • deemed custody
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                                                                              (4)-22-APEAL-315-2026.doc


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                          CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2026

                      Vanita Ramkumar Mali                              …Appellant

                              V/s.

                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                   ...Respondents


                      Mr. Siddhasen Yadav a/w Mr. Siddhant S., Advocate for the
PRAMOD                Appellant.
SANTOSH
LAKARE                Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State.
Digitally signed by
PRAMOD                Mr. Amandeep Singh Sra h/f Adv. Advait Shukla, Advocate for the
SANTOSH LAKARE
Date: 2026.09.10
19:10:33 +0530
                      Respondent No.2.
                      ACP. Mahesh Mugutrao, Tardeo Division, Mumbai, is present.


                                                       CORAM        :   N.R. BORKAR, J.
                                                       DATE         :   10.09.2026.

                      P.C. :

                      1.                The learned APP submits that during the pendency of

                      the present appeal, the prosecution has filed the charge-sheet. In

                      that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the appellant, on

                      instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with

                      liberty to file an application for regular bail before the Special

                      Court/Trial Court.



                      2.                If such application is filed within a period of three

                      Pramod S.Lakare
                                                              1/2
                                                          (4)-22-APEAL-315-2026.doc


weeks from today, the appellant shall not be arrested till the

decision of the said application.



3.                The Special Court/Trial Court for the purpose of deciding

the said application for regular bail shall treat the present

appellant as deemed to be in custody.



4.                Needless to mention that Special Court/Trial Court shall

decide the application on it’s own merits.



5.                The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.



                                                   [N.R.BORKAR, J.]




Pramod S.Lakare
                                          2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.