Bombay High Court
VANITA RAMKUMAR MALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed off as Withdrawn
Holding
The appeal was withdrawn and the appellant was ordered to be treated as deemed in custody for the purpose of a regular bail application, which shall be decided on its merits.
Summary
Vanita Ramkumar Mali appealed against the State of Maharashtra. During the pendency of the appeal, the prosecution filed a charge‑sheet. The appellant, through counsel, sought leave to withdraw the appeal and to file an application for regular bail before the Special Court/Trial Court. The Court allowed the withdrawal, directing that if a bail application is filed within three weeks, the appellant shall not be arrested until the bail application is decided. The Court further directed that for the purpose of the bail application the appellant shall be treated as deemed to be in custody, and the bail application shall be decided on its own merits. Accordingly, the appeal was disposed of on these terms.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal pending before the High Court can be withdrawn after the filing of a charge‑sheet.
- Whether the appellant can be treated as deemed in custody for the purpose of a regular bail application.
- Whether the High Court can direct that the appellant not be arrested pending the decision of the bail application.
Subjects
- withdrawal of appeal
- charge‑sheet
- regular bail
- deemed custody
- criminal procedure
Judgment
(4)-22-APEAL-315-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 315 OF 2026
Vanita Ramkumar Mali …Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Siddhasen Yadav a/w Mr. Siddhant S., Advocate for the
PRAMOD Appellant.
SANTOSH
LAKARE Mr. P. H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State.
Digitally signed by
PRAMOD Mr. Amandeep Singh Sra h/f Adv. Advait Shukla, Advocate for the
SANTOSH LAKARE
Date: 2026.09.10
19:10:33 +0530
Respondent No.2.
ACP. Mahesh Mugutrao, Tardeo Division, Mumbai, is present.
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 10.09.2026.
P.C. :
1. The learned APP submits that during the pendency of
the present appeal, the prosecution has filed the charge-sheet. In
that view of the matter, the learned counsel for the appellant, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal with
liberty to file an application for regular bail before the Special
Court/Trial Court.
2. If such application is filed within a period of three
Pramod S.Lakare
1/2
(4)-22-APEAL-315-2026.doc
weeks from today, the appellant shall not be arrested till the
decision of the said application.
3. The Special Court/Trial Court for the purpose of deciding
the said application for regular bail shall treat the present
appellant as deemed to be in custody.
4. Needless to mention that Special Court/Trial Court shall
decide the application on it’s own merits.
5. The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.]
Pramod S.Lakare
2/2
Checking your session…