Bombay High Court
DEVGIRI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA M. JALNA, BRANCH MANTHA THR BRANCH MANAGER VINOD TUKARAM KAMBLEversusJUGALKISHORE RAMESHWARJI DAYMA
- Disposal
- Withdrawn
Holding
The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn in accordance with the appellant's written request.
Summary
The appellant, Devgiri Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against Jugalkishore Rameshwaji Dayma. The appellant's counsel submitted a written communication from the client indicating a desire not to prosecute the matter further. The court considered whether the appeal could be withdrawn after filing. Relying on the client's written instruction, the court held that the appeal could be withdrawn. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a criminal appeal can be withdrawn on the basis of a written communication from the appellant's client
Subjects
- withdrawal of appeal
- criminal procedure
- high court
- written communication
Judgment
20-Cri-Apeal-374-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
20 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 374 OF 2019
DEVGIRI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA M. JALNA, BRANCH
MANTHA THR BRANCH MANAGER VINOD TUKARAM KAMBLE
VERSUS
JUGALKISHORE RAMESHWARJI DAYMA
.…
Mr. Swapnil Joshi h/f Mr. Swapnil S. Patunkar, Advocate for
Appellant
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : 07 September, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. Learned counsel for appellant makes a statement that
he has received the written communication from his client that not
to prosecute the matter further. The written communication is
placed on record.
2. In view of written communication, appeal is disposed
off as withdrawn.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Checking your session…