Bombay High Court
ASHOKKUMARR AKSHYABATNATH MISHTRAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
- Disposal
- ABATED
Holding
The appeal stands abated due to the appellant's death and is therefore disposed of.
Summary
The appellant, Ashokkumarr Akshyabatnath Mishtra, filed a criminal appeal but did not appear before the court. A bailable warrant was issued, and a report indicated that the appellant had died, though his son failed to produce a death certificate. The court considered whether the appeal could continue in the absence of a death certificate. It held that the appeal stands abated due to the appellant's death, despite the missing certificate. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of as abated.
Issues considered
- The appeal can proceed when the appellant is reported dead but no death certificate is produced
Subjects
- criminal appeal
- abated appeal
- death of appellant
- procedural law
- bailable warrant
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45360
1/1 958-APEAL-393-2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
958 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 393 OF 2002
Ashokkumarr Akshyabatnath Mishtra
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra
…..
Mr. M. A. Aher, APP for Respondent – State.
…..
CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.
DATE : 29 SEPTEMBER, 2026
PC:
1. Since nobody was appearing on behalf of the appellant, a bailable
warrant was issued against the appellant. The report discloses that the
appellant has expired. However, his son would not produced the death
certificate. Since there is a report stating that the appellant has expired,
the appeal stands abated.
2. Hence, the appeal is disposed of as abated.
(SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.)
Kiran Kawre
Checking your session…