Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHARAT LAXMAN DHEMBREversusCHHAGAN BABAN KALE AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

In Criminal Appeal No. 564 of 2016, the appellant Bharat Laxman Dhembre sought permission to withdraw the appeal and re‑file it before the Sessions Court, relying on a precedent of the Supreme Court. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted a request for leave to withdraw, citing Celestium Financial v. Ghanasekaran (2005) SC 2099. The Court considered the submission and granted liberty to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed and recorded as withdrawn. The Court directed the Sessions Court to consider any delay if the appeal is re‑filed, as the matter remains pending there.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the criminal appeal and re‑file it before the Sessions Court

Subjects

  • withdrawal of appeal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • procedural law
  • re‑filing before Sessions Court

Judgment

                                                                                           56-APEAL-564-2016.doc



                               N.S.Kamble


                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.564 OF 2016


                               Bharat Laxman Dhembre                                    … Appellant
                                     Versus
            Digitally signed
NILAM   by NILAM
        SANTOSH
                               Shri.Chhagan Baban Kale & Anr.                           … Respondents
SANTOSH KAMBLE
KAMBLE Date: 2026.01.09
        11:27:23 +0530         ________________________________________________________
                               Mr.R.S. Kate, for the Appellants.
                               Ms.R.D. Humane, APP for Respondent-State.
                               ________________________________________________________
                                                               CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

                                                               DATE           : 8th JANUARY, 2026

                               P.C. :

                               .            Heard learned counsel for Applicant and learned APP for the

                               Respondent No.2-State.

                               2.           Learned counsel for Applicant on instructions seeks leave to

                               withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned

                               Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case

                               Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc. (2005) SC 2099.

                               3.           Considering the submission of learned counsel for Appellant,

                               Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

                                                                Page 1 of 2
                                                           56-APEAL-564-2016.doc



N.S.Kamble


4.           Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn.

5.           Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is

filed as application was pending before this Court.



                                                (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                  Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.