Bombay High Court
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGAUTAM SANDU BHALERAO
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- ABHAY S WAGHWASE
Holding
A court may correct a typographical error in a judgment by speaking to minutes without affecting the substantive outcome.
Summary
The State of Maharashtra appealed against Gautam Sandu Bhalerao in a criminal matter. In the judgment dated 20-02-2026, the respondent's name was erroneously recorded as 'Gauram' instead of 'Gautam'. The appellant moved a motion for speaking to minutes to correct this typographical error. The Court, noting that the error was purely clerical and did not affect the substantive findings, allowed the correction and directed that the judgment read the name as 'Gautam Sandu Bhalerao'. The motion was consequently disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a court may correct a typographical error in a judgment by speaking to minutes
Subjects
- typographical error
- correction of judgment
- speaking to minutes
- criminal appeal
- court procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:7450
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
APEAL-60-2015 SMO.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 60 OF 2015
The State of Maharashtra ...Appellant
Versus
Gautam Sandu Bhalerao ...Respondent
***
• Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for the Appellant/State
• Mr. Atharva Dange h/f Mr. C. P. Sengaonkar, Advocate for the
Respondent
***
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J
DATE : MARCH 04, 2026
PC.:
1. This motion is moved for speaking to minutes of judgment
dated 20.02.2026.
2. It is submitted that, name of the Respondent is wrongly
typed as ‘Gauram’ instead of ‘Gautam’.
3. This being typographical error, prayer for speaking to
minutes is allowed.
4. In judgment dated 20.02.2026 the named of Respondent be
read as “Gautam Sandu Bhalerao”.
5. Motion stands disposed of.
(ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.)
Umesh
PAGE 1 OF 1
Checking your session…