Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NAKUL JITENDER BHOITEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The appellant, Nakul J. Bhoite, filed a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear or present any counsel. The record indicated that the appellant was not interested in prosecuting the appeal. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Mr. P.H. Gaikwad. The Court observed the lack of prosecution by the appellant and, pursuant to procedural rules, dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were addressed.

Issues considered

  • Whether an appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the appellant does not appear or pursue the proceedings?

Subjects

  • Criminal Appeal
  • Dismissal
  • Want of Prosecution
  • High Court
  • Procedural Law

Judgment

         Digitally
         signed by
         DINESH
DINESH   SADANAND
SADANAND SHERLA
SHERLA   Date:
                                                                                18-APEAL-621-26.odt
         2026.08.28
         17:15:21
         +0530




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                       CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.621 OF 2026

                      Nakul J. Bhoite                                      …Appellant
                           V/s.
                      The State of Maharashtra & Anr.                      ...Respondent.

                                                      …………..
                      None for the Appellant.
                      Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State.
                                                   …………..

                                                    CORAM         :   N.R. BORKAR, J.
                                                    DATE          :   28.08.2026.

                      P.C. :

                               None present for the appellant. It appears from the record of
                      appeal that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the
                      present appeal. The Appeal is thus dismissed for want of
                      prosecution.



                                                                  [N.R.BORKAR, J.]




                      Dinesh S. Sherla                      1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.