Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PANKAJ RAVINDRA BARTAKKEversusBABAN TUKARAM SAPTE AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The proceedings are to be transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction.

Summary

Pankaj Ravindra Bartakke appealed against Baban Tukaram Sapte and another. The appellant, through counsel, relied on the Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) to argue that the matter should be before the Sessions Court having jurisdiction. The High Court considered the submission and ordered that the proceedings be transferred to the appropriate Sessions Court. The Registrar was directed to effect the transfer and the Sessions Court was instructed to re‑register the case, issue notices and expedite the matter. The appeal and any interim applications were thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal appeal should be transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction in view of the Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran

Subjects

  • transfer of jurisdiction
  • criminal appeal
  • sessions court
  • procedural law
  • jurisdiction
  • appeal disposal

Judgment

            Digitally signed
            by LAXMIKANT
LAXMIKANT   GOPAL                                                    936-APEAL-623-2018 (CR).DOCX
GOPAL       CHANDAN
CHANDAN     Date:
            2026.08.24
            20:35:22 +0530                                                                      lgc

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                               CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                             CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 623 OF 2018

                               Pankaj Ravindra Bartakke                                : Appellant
                                     VERSUS
                               Baban Tukaram Sapte And Anr                            : Respondents

                               __________________________________________________________

                               Mr. Prashant Kulkarni a/w Mr. Ajay Parekar for the Appellant.
                               Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
                               __________________________________________________________

                                                        CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                                         DATED :      21 AUGUST 2026
                               PC:-



                               1.     Heard learned Advocate for the Appellant and learned APP
                               for the Respondent – State.

                               2.     Learned Advocates for the parties, by referring to the
                               decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium
                               Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 SCC OnLine
                               SC 1320, submit that these proceedings would now lay before the
                               Sessions Court having jurisdiction. They therefore request that
                               these proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court having
                               jurisdiction.

                               3.     In view of the above, the following order is passed :-




                                                                 1
                                       936-APEAL-623-2018 (CR).DOCX


     (i)   The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions
           Court, having jurisdiction;

     (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate
           steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions
           Court, having jurisdiction;

     (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be
           transferred or assigned, after re-registration of the same,
           shall issue notice to the parties to the said proceedings
           and thereafter proceed with the matter on its own merits
           and in accordance with law.

     (iv) Considering the proceedings which are now being
           transferred have been pending for some time, the
           Sessions Court to which these proceedings would be
           assigned is requested to make an endeavour to expedite
           the proceedings. Parties shall cooperate in the early
           disposal of the proceedings.

4.    Criminal Appeal No.623 of 2018 is disposed of.

5.    Interim Application, if any, is also disposed of.




                                             (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




                                   2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.