Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

XYZversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The appeals are dismissed as nothing survives in view of the regular bail and charge-sheet filing.

Summary

The appellants filed criminal appeals challenging the trial proceedings after a charge-sheet was filed against the respondent. The respondent was subsequently granted regular bail. The appellants argued that the filing of the charge-sheet and the bail did not preclude the appeals, while the respondents contended that nothing remained for the appeals to address. The Court examined whether any substantive issues survived post-bail and concluded that the grant of regular bail and the filing of the charge-sheet rendered the appeals moot. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeals.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal appeals are maintainable after the filing of the charge-sheet and the grant of regular bail to the respondent

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal appeal
  • charge-sheet
  • appeal dismissal
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:28989
                                                                     944-APEAL-684-2025.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 684 OF 2025

                                           XYZ
                                          VERSUS
                            The State Of Maharashtra And Another

                          WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 686 OF 2025

                                           XYZ
                                          VERSUS
                            The State Of Maharashtra And Another

                          WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 685 OF 2025

                                               Xyz
                                             VERSUS
                             The State Of Maharashtra And Another
                                                …
          Mr. A. L. Kanade, Advocate for Appellant
          Mr. G. O. Wattamwar, APP for Respondents
          Mr. P. M. Borde h/f Mr. S. S. Chapalgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
                                                ...

                                                           CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
                                                           DATE  : JULY 17, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.          This Court is informed that after filing of the charge-sheet, trial

          has commenced and the contesting Respondent has been granted regular

          bail. In view of this, it is the submission of learned Counsel for Respondent

          that nothing survives in the present Appeals.


          2.          Learned Counsel for Appellants does not dispute the fact with

          regard to filing of charge-sheet and enlargement of contesting Respondent


                                            Page 1 of 2
                                                      944-APEAL-684-2025.odt



on regular bail.


3.           In view of above, nothing survives in the present Appeals.

Hence, these Appeals stand dismissed.


                                                (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani




                                 Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.