Bombay High Court
SANTOSH GAJANAN GADHAVE .versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
- Decided
- Disposal
- Abated
Holding
The appeal is dismissed as abated due to the death of the appellant.
Summary
The appellant, Santosh Gajanan Gadhave, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. While the appeal was pending, the appellant died on 14 August 2005, as confirmed by a police report taken on record. The appellant's counsel was absent, and the respondent was represented by Mr. V. N. Sagare. The High Court considered whether the death of the appellant abated the criminal appeal. Concluding that the appeal could not proceed against a deceased person, the Court dismissed the appeal as abated.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of the appellant's death on the pending criminal appeal?
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 498-A
Subjects
- criminal appeal
- abated appeal
- death of appellant
- Section 498-A
- IPC
- procedural law
Judgment
1 44-APEAL 869-01.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.869 OF 2001
Santosh Gajanan Gadhave … Appellant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
-----
None for the Appellant.
Mr. V. N. Sagare, APP for the Respondent-State.
-----
CORAM : N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE : 31ST AUGUST 2026
P.C. :
1. This Appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 21 st
MUGDHA September 2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in
MANOJ
PARANJAPE Sessions Case No.473 of 2000.
Digitally signed by
MUGDHA MANOJ
PARANJAPE
Date: 2026.08.31
18:20:40 +0530
2. By the impugned judgment and order, the Learned Additional
Sessions Judge has convicted the present Appellant for the offence
punishable under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced
him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year.
3. The report received from the concerned police station shows that
during pendency of the present Appeal, the Appellant has expired on 14 th
August 2005. The report is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for the purpose
of identification.
4. The Criminal Appeal is thus dismissed as abated.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
Mugdha 1 of 1
Checking your session…