Bombay High Court
AMBADAS BHIMSHA GAIKWADversusSANTOSH SIDRAM MANE AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal is transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction.
Summary
The appellant, Ambadas Bhimsha Gaikwak, was absent when the appeal was called. The State's counsel, Nitin B. Patil, cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025) to argue that the matter should be before a Sessions Court with appropriate jurisdiction. The High Court agreed and ordered the transfer of the proceedings to the competent Sessions Court, directing the registrar to effect the transfer and the Sessions Court to re‑register, notify parties, and expedite the case. The Court also directed cooperation of parties for early disposal. Consequently, Criminal Appeal No. 881 of 2012 and any interim applications were disposed of.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate forum for the pending criminal proceedings?
- Whether the appeal should be transferred to a Sessions Court having jurisdiction
Subjects
- jurisdiction
- transfer of proceedings
- criminal appeal
- sessions court
- procedural law
Judgment
Digitally signed
by LAXMIKANT
LAXMIKANT GOPAL
GOPAL CHANDAN 7) APEAL-881.12 (CR).DOCX
CHANDAN Date:
2026.08.24
19:47:25 +0530
lgc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 881 OF 2012
Ambadas Bhimsha Gaikwad : Appellant.
VERSUS
Santosh Sidram Mane And Anr. : Respondents.
______________________________________________________
None for the Appellant
Mr. Nitin B Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
______________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED : 24 AUGUST 2026
PC:-
1. When this matter is called out, neither the Appellant nor the
Advocate for the Appellant are present physically or through V. C.
mode.
2. Learned APP for the Respondent – State, by referring to the
decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium
Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine
SC 1320, submits that these proceedings would now lay before the
Sessions Court having jurisdiction. He therefore submits that these
proceedings be transferred to the Sessions Court having
jurisdiction.
3. In view of the above, the following order is passed :-
1
7) APEAL-881.12 (CR).DOCX
(i) The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions
Court, having jurisdiction;
(ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate
steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions
Court, having jurisdiction;
(iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be
transferred or assigned, after re-registration of the same,
shall issue notice to the parties to the said proceedings
and thereafter proceed with the matter on its own merits
and in accordance with law.
(iv) Considering the proceedings which are now being
transferred have been pending for some time, the
Sessions Court to which these proceedings would be
assigned is requested to make an endeavour to expedite
the proceedings. Parties shall cooperate in the early
disposal of the proceedings.
4. Criminal Appeal No. 881 of 2012 is disposed of.
5. Interim Application, if any, is also disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
2
Checking your session…