Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PRITHVIRAJ JAYCHAND OSWALversusNEELA SHASHIKANT KULKARNI AND ANR

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court ordered that the criminal appeal be transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction.

Summary

The appellant, Prithviraj Jaychand Oswal, was absent when the matter was called before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. The State’s counsel, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320), argued that the criminal appeal should be heard by the Sessions Court having jurisdiction. The High Court agreed and ordered the transfer of the proceedings to the appropriate Sessions Court, directing the registrar to effect the transfer and the Sessions Court to re‑register, notify the parties, and expedite the case. The appeal and any interim applications were disposed of. The order emphasizes procedural compliance for jurisdictional transfer in criminal matters.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate forum for hearing Criminal Appeal No. 939 of 2015 – the High Court or the Sessions Court having jurisdiction?

Subjects

  • jurisdiction
  • transfer of proceedings
  • criminal appeal
  • High Court
  • Sessions Court
  • procedural order

Judgment

          Digitally signed
          by LAXMIKANT
LAXMIKANT GOPAL
GOPAL     CHANDAN                                                 19) APEAL-939.15 (CR).DOCX
CHANDAN   Date:
          2026.08.24
          19:47:28 +0530
                                                                                                lgc

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                        CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 939 OF 2015

                         Prithviraj Jaychand Oswal                                : Appellant
                                VERSUS
                         Neela Shashikant Kulkarni And Anr                        : Respondents

                         ______________________________________________________

                         None for the Appellant.
                         Mr. S. S. Choudhari, APP for the Respondent – State.
                         ______________________________________________________

                                                   CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

                                                    DATED : 24 AUGUST 2026
                         PC:-



                         1.      When this matter is called out, neither the Appellant nor the
                         Advocate for the Appellant are present physically or through V. C.
                         mode.

                         2.      Learned APP for the Respondent – State, by referring to the
                         decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium
                         Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine
                         SC 1320, submits that these proceedings would now lay before the
                         Sessions Court having jurisdiction. He therefore submits that these
                         proceedings     be   transferred   to   the   Sessions    Court   having
                         jurisdiction.

                         3.      In view of the above, the following order is passed :-



                                                             1
                                          19) APEAL-939.15 (CR).DOCX


     (i)   The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions
           Court, having jurisdiction;

     (ii) The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate
           steps for transferring these proceedings to the Sessions
           Court, having jurisdiction;

     (iii) The Sessions Court, to which these proceedings would be
           transferred or assigned, after re-registration of the same,
           shall issue notice to the parties to the said proceedings
           and thereafter proceed with the matter on its own merits
           and in accordance with law.

     (iv) Considering the proceedings which are now being
           transferred have been pending for some time, the
           Sessions Court to which these proceedings would be
           assigned is requested to make an endeavour to expedite
           the proceedings. Parties shall cooperate in the early
           disposal of the proceedings.

4.    Criminal Appeal No. 939 of 2015 is disposed of.

5.    Interim Application, if any, is also disposed of.




                                             (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)




                                   2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.