Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH HERBALS THORUGH PARTNER DR RAJEEV BAJARANG THORATversusSUJIT R. HALARANKAR AND ANR

Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The appeal must be transferred to the Sessions Court having jurisdiction, and the High Court’s proceedings are thereby disposed of.

Summary

The appellant, Ganesh Herbals Through Partner Dr. Rajeev Bajarang Thorat, was absent along with his counsel when the matter was called. The State, represented by Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320) to argue that the proceedings should be before a Sessions Court with jurisdiction. The High Court agreed, ordering the transfer of the appeal to the appropriate Sessions Court. The Registrar was directed to effect the transfer and the Sessions Court was instructed to re‑register the case, issue notices, and expedite the matter. Consequently, Criminal Appeal No. 981 of 2014 and any pending interim applications were disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear the criminal appeal or it should be transferred to a Sessions Court having jurisdiction.
  • Whether the precedent set by Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran mandates transfer of such proceedings to the Sessions Court.

Subjects

  • jurisdiction
  • transfer of proceedings
  • sessions court
  • criminal appeal
  • court jurisdiction
  • case management

Judgment

                                                               1/2
                                                                               14-APEAL-981-2014 (CR).DOC


                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

                                            CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                CR. APPEAL NO. 981 OF 2014

                        Ganesh Herbals Thorugh Partner
                        Dr Rajeev Bajarang Thorat                                   …...Appellant
                               VERSUS
                        Sujit R. Halarankar And Anr.                                 …...Respondents

                        _________________________________________________________________


                        None for Applicant.
                        Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, A.P.P., for Respondent No.2 - State.
                        _________________________________________________________________

          Digitally
          signed by
          SHANTANU
SHANTANU SHANKARSA
SHANKARSA DHUDUM
DHUDUM    Date:
          2026.10.07
          20:49:33
          +0530
                                            CORAM        :   ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
                                            DATE         :   7th OCTOBER, 2026.
                        P.C.


                        1.           When this matter is called out, neither the Appellant nor the

                        Advocate for the Appellant are present physically or through V. C. mode.


                        2.          Learned APP for the Respondent – State, by referring to the

                        decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Celestium Financial

                        Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 , submits

                        that this proceedings would now lay before the Sessions Court having

                        jurisdiction. She therefore submits that this proceedings be transferred to

                        the Sessions Court having jurisdiction.


                        3.          In view of the above, the following order is passed :-

               Shantanu S. Dhudum
                                                2/2
                                                                14-APEAL-981-2014 (CR).DOC


              (i)    The present proceedings be transferred to the Sessions

                     Court, having jurisdiction;


              (ii)   The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to take appropriate

                     steps for transferring this proceedings to the Sessions

                     Court, having jurisdiction;


              (iii) The Sessions Court, to which this proceedings would be

                     transferred or assigned, after re-registration of the same,

                     shall issue notice to the parties to the said proceedings

                     and thereafter proceed with the matter on its own merits

                     and in accordance with law.


              (iv) Considering the proceedings which are now being

                     transferred have been pending for some time, the

                     Sessions Court to which these proceedings would be

                     assigned is requested to make an endeavour to expedite

                     the proceedings. Parties shall cooperate in the early

                     disposal of the proceedings.


         4.          Criminal Appeal No. 981 of 2014 is disposed of.


         5.          All pending Interim Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.




                                                       ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)

Shantanu S. Dhudum


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.