Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SIDDHESH SURESH KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposal
Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Siddhesh Suresh Kadam, filed two criminal applications (Nos. 1570 and 1558 of 2024) before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench. After hearing, the court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the impugned order. On that indication, the applicant’s counsel, on instructions, sought leave to withdraw both applications. The court accepted the statement and dismissed the applications as withdrawn. No merits of the underlying matters were considered.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may permit the withdrawal of pending criminal applications.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court
  • procedural dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-KOL:9505
                                                                          18.APL.1570.2024.odt



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                           CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                            CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1570 OF 2024

          Siddhesh Suresh Kadam                                     ...Applicant

                   Versus

          The State of Maharashtra and Another        ...Respondents
                                           WITH
                       CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1558 OF 2024

                                             ***
           Mr. Anand S. Patil, a/w Mr. Soham V. Powar and Mr. Pratik B. Bhakare,
           Advocate for the Applicant.
           Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for Respondent – State.
                                             ***

                                               CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
                                               DATE  : OCTOBER 01, 2026
          PER COURT :

          1.                After hearing the learned counsel for the Applicant in both

          matters, when this Court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the

          impugned order, at that time, learned counsel for the Applicant/s, on

          instructions, sought leave to withdraw both the Applications.

          2.                His statement is accepted.

          3.                In view of the statement, the Applications are dismissed as

          withdrawn.


                                                              (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)


          Shrikant Malani                                                         Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.