Bombay High Court
SATISH DNYANDEO KADAM AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate Court.
Summary
Satish Dnyandeo Kadam and another filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The Court expressed its reluctance to interfere with the prayers sought. The applicants' counsel then sought time to take instructions and subsequently applied to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate Court. The Court accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty granted to the applicants to file a suitable application elsewhere.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court should entertain the relief sought in the criminal application
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- court discretion
Judgment
10-APL-469-2024 (CR).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.469 OF 2024
Satish Dnyandeo Kadam and another ] Applicants
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and another ] Respondents
.....
Mr. Abhay Jadhavar a/w Ms. Sampada S. Patil, Advocates for Applicants.
Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P, for Respondent No.1 – State.
Digitally
…..
signed by
SHAILAJA
SHAILAJA SHRIKANT
SHRIKANT HALKUDE
HALKUDE Date:
2026.08.20
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
17:59:23
+0530 DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Upon hearing the learned Advocate for the Applicants, and when
this Court expressed its disinclination to interfere with the prayers sought in
the Application, the learned Advocate for the Applicants sought time to take
instructions.
2. After the matter was passed over, the learned Advocate for the
Applicants, on instructions, sought leave to withdraw the Application, with
liberty to file an appropriate Application before the appropriate Court. His
statement is accepted.
3. In view of the statement made on instructions, the Application is
dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)
Shailaja Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…