Bombay High Court

ARUN DEVIDAS MAGAREversusPRITI CHANDRAKANT MAGRE AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The High Court refused to grant anticipatory bail and dismissed the application as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Priti Chandrakant Magre, filed an anticipatory bail application (No. 359 of 2025) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking pre‑emptive release from custody. The State opposed the application. After hearing both sides, the Court expressed its disinclination to grant any relief. Consequently, the applicant's counsel requested withdrawal of the application. The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn, and any pending applications, if any, were ordered disposed of.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate exercise of discretion by the High Court in granting or refusing anticipatory bail under the Criminal Procedure Code?

Subjects

anticipatory bail
criminal procedure
withdrawal of application
high court
discretion

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:35058




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 359 OF 2025

                                       Priti Chandrakant Magre
                                               VERSUS
                                      The State Of Maharashtra

                         WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1041 OF 2025
                                      IN ABA/359/2025
                                        Arun Devidas Magare
                                               VERSUS
                                Priti Chandrakant Magre And Another

           Mr. A. V. Patil (Indrale), Advocate for applicant
           Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for respondent-State

                                                  CORAM        : R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                                  DATE         : 11th AUGUST, 2026

           PER COURT :-


           1.             After hearing learned Counsel for both sides and when this

           Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief to the applicant,

           learned Counsel for the applicant seeks withdrawal of the application.


           2.             Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.


           3.             Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.



                                                                    (R. M. JOSHI, J.)

           B. S. Joshi




           938-ABA-359-2025.odt                                                    1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…