Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Nisha Nikhil KanungoversusNikhil Nandikishore Kanungo

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Leave to withdraw the application was granted and the application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The applicant, Nisha Nikhil Kanungo, filed a criminal application and later, through counsel Ms. Husna Aray, sought leave to withdraw the application. The High Court considered whether it should permit the withdrawal. The court granted leave to withdraw, emphasizing that the application would not be heard on its merits. Accordingly, the application was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the dispute were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court should grant leave to withdraw the criminal application.

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • high court

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
          WAKLE
WAKLE     MANOJ        MANOJ                                             902-APPLN-124-2025.DOC
MANOJ     JANARDHAN
JANARDHAN Date:
          2026.08.21
          18:38:54
          +0530

                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.124 OF 2025
                       Nisha Nikhil Kanungo                                  …Applicant
                             V/s.
                       Nikhil Nandikishore Kanungo                           …Respondent


                       Ms. Husna Aray i/by Mr. D.P. Jaiswal, for the Applicant.
                       Ms. S.K. Gajare, APP for the Respondent-State.


                                                 CORAM: SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
                                                 DATED : 21st AUGUST, 2026
                       P.C. :-

                       1.      Ms. Aray learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions,
                       seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application.

                       2.      Leave to withdraw is granted.

                       3.      Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

                       4.      It is made clear that this Application is not heard on merits.



                                                        (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)




                                                      Page 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.