Bombay High Court
ASIF KHAN NAWAB KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- R M JOSHI
Holding
The application is allowed, imposing specific undertakings as bail conditions and providing that any breach will lead to cancellation of bail.
Summary
The applicant, Asif Khan Nawab Khan, sought additional time to take instructions regarding photographs and NCs presented by the second respondent. He subsequently filed an affidavit voluntarily undertaking not to enter the local limits of Aurangabad, not to contact the informant or her family, and not to visit the informant's college or locality until the conclusion of a pending trial in Special Case No. 698/2025. The second respondent expressed satisfaction with this undertaking, and the court accepted the affidavit as a binding undertaking. Consequently, the High Court allowed the application, granting the bail conditions specified in prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘D’, and warned that any breach, even once, would result in cancellation of bail. The court also quantified fees for the appointed counsel for the second respondent at Rs.10,000, to be paid by the High Court Legal Aid Services Sub‑Committee.
Issues considered
- What conditions may be imposed on bail in a criminal application pending a special trial?
- Whether an affidavit undertaking by the accused can be accepted as a binding condition for bail?
- Consequences of breach of bail conditions in the present case
Subjects
- bail
- undertaking
- breach of conditions
- High Court
- criminal application
- Special Judge
- legal aid
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:28990
930-APPLN-1403-2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1403 OF 2026
Asif Khan Nawab Khan
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. R. M. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. B. Narwade, APP for Respondents
Ms. R. S. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 (appointed)
...
CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE : JULY 17, 2026
P. C. :
1. This Application was heard yesterday. Learned Counsel for the
Applicant had sought time to take instructions with regard to photographs
and NC’s placed on record by the Counsel for Respondent No.2.
2. Today, learned Counsel for the Applicant filed affidavit of the
Applicant making voluntary statement that he will not enter the local limits
of Aurangabad City till conclusion of trial in Special Case No. 698/2025
pending before Special Judge, Aurangabad. He has further undertaken not
to contact informant or her family members and not to visit college of the
informant or locality where informant and her family resides.
3. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2 records satisfaction to
the undertaking given by way of affidavit.
Page 1 of 2
930-APPLN-1403-2026.odt
4. The affidavit and the statements in the affidavit, more
particularly, statements made in paragraph 2 thereof are accepted as an
undertaking to this Court.
5. In view of above, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer
clauses ‘B’ & ‘D’.
6. It is clarified that breach of conditions even on single occasion
will result into cancellation of bail.
7. Fees of appointed Counsel for Respondent No. 2 is quantified @
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only).
8. Secretary, High Court Legal Aid Services Sub-Committee,
Aurangabad to paid fess to appointed Counsel.
(R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani
Page 2 of 2
Checking your session…