Bombay High Court

GANESH VIJAY PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, and pending applications are disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against alleged criminal proceedings. The Court expressed disinclination to grant bail and, upon the petitioner's instruction, the application was withdrawn. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn, and all pending applications were disposed of. No substantive merits of the bail request were examined. The order reflects procedural withdrawal rather than a substantive adjudication on bail eligibility.

Issues considered

What is the appropriate procedural outcome when an anticipatory bail application is withdrawn by the applicant?

Subjects

anticipatory bail
withdrawal
criminal procedure
high court
procedural dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43466
                                                                     922-ABA-472-2026.odt



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                     922 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 472 OF 2026

                                       Shivraj Brijlal Patil
                                            VERSUS
                                    The State Of Maharashtra

          Ms. Sarika Chandak h/f Ms. S. G. Sonawane, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents/State

               WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1634 OF 2026 IN ABA/472/2026

                                        Ganesh Vijay Patil
                                            VERSUS
                              The State Of Maharashtra And Another

          Mr. H. P. Randhir, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents

               WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2873 OF 2026 IN ABA/472/2026

            Car24 Services Private Ltd Thr Its Auth Officer Pravin Sudhakar Bhalerao
                                             VERSUS
                                Shivraj Brijlal Patil And Another

          Mr. D. P. Munde, Advocate for Applicant
          Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents

                                                          CORAM :R. M. JOSHI, J.
                                                          DATE  :SEPTEMBER 24, 2026

          P. C. :

          1.             After hearing learned Counsels for both sides and when this

          Court has shown its disinclination to grant any relief to Applicant, learned

          Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the

          Application.




                                            Page 1 of 2
                                                              922-ABA-472-2026.odt



2.           In view of this, Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed as

withdrawn.


3.           Pending applications stand disposed of.


                                                       (R. M. JOSHI, J.)
Malani




                                   Page 2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…