Bombay High Court
KULDEEP PRABHAKARRAO GHANversusRAMKISHAN GANPAT THAKUR AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court condoned the 108‑day delay in filing the leave‑to‑appeal application.
Summary
The petitioner, Kuldeep Prabhakarrão Ghan, filed a criminal application seeking condonation of a 108‑day delay in filing a leave‑to‑appeal petition. The respondent, Ramkishan Ganpat T1hakur, and the State opposed the condonation, arguing that the delay was unjustified. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted reasons for the delay, which the court considered. The bench, after reviewing the submissions, found the explanation satisfactory. Consequently, the court ordered that the delay be condoned. The criminal application was thereafter disposed.
Issues considered
- Whether the 108‑day delay in filing the leave‑to‑appeal application can be condoned?
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- leave to appeal
- criminal procedure
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45562
913-Cri-Appln-1755-2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
913 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1755 OF 2019
KULDEEP PRABHAKARRAO GHAN
VERSUS
RAMKISHAN GANPAT T1HAKUR AND ANR
.…
Mr. S. R. Danekar h/f Mr. Chandrashekhar S. Kulkarni, Advocate
for Applicant
Mr. Shashikant S. Londhe, Advocate for Respondent No.1
Ms A. S. Mantri, APP for Respondent No.2 - State
.…
CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.
DATE : 30 September, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. This is an application for condonation of 108 days
delay caused in filing leave to appeal.
2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 and the learned
APP strongly opposed the application for condonation of delay.
3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is
allowed. Delay condoned.
4. Criminal Application is disposed off.
[ ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ]
SMS
1 of 1
Checking your session…